United States v. Conrad Dickson , 676 F. App'x 609 ( 2017 )

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 16-3059
___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee
v.
Conrad Eliot Dickson
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Western District of Arkansas - Fayetteville
____________
Submitted: February 6, 2017
Filed: February 9, 2017
[Unpublished]
____________
Before WOLLMAN, MURPHY, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Conrad Dickson appeals after the district court1 denied his petition for a writ
of error coram nobis, in which he sought to vacate a prior conviction for which he had
served his sentence. His petition asserted an ineffective-assistance claim and other
claims that were essentially considered and resolved in a prior 28 U.S.C. § 2255
motion. Following careful de novo review, we conclude that the district court
properly denied Dickson’s petition. See United States v. Camacho-Bordes, 94 F.3d
1168, 1173 (8th Cir. 1996) (reviewing de novo district court’s legal conclusions in
denying coram nobis relief); see also Chaidez v. United States, 133 S. Ct. 1103, 1108
& n.5 (2013) (discussing the contours of the Sixth Amendment right to counsel and
labeling sex-offender registration as one of the “collateral consequences” of a
conviction); George v. Black, 732 F.2d 108, 110 (8th Cir. 1984) (determining that
accused need only be informed of direct consequences of guilty plea); Azzone v.
United States, 341 F.2d 417, 418-19 (8th Cir. 1965) (per curiam) (noting that, if
sentence has been served, individual may file petition for writ of error coram nobis
in attempt to vacate prior conviction, while also holding that a petitioner is not
entitled to review of issues that were considered and resolved in a prior § 2255
motion). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
1
The Honorable Timothy L. Brooks, United States District Judge for the
Western District of Arkansas, partially adopting the report and recommendations of
the Honorable Erin L. Setser, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District
of Arkansas.
-2-