United States v. Janis Kreitinger ( 2004 )


Menu:
  •                       United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    ___________
    No. 03-2988
    ___________
    United States of America,              *
    *
    Appellee,               *
    *
    v.                              *
    *
    Janis Kreitinger,                      *
    *
    Appellant,              *
    * Appeal from the United States
    ----------------                       * District Court for the
    * Northern District of Iowa.
    United States of America,              *
    *       [UNPUBLISHED]
    Appellee,               *
    *
    v.                              *
    *
    Janis Kreitinger,                      *
    *
    Appellant.              *
    ___________
    Submitted: June 4, 2004
    Filed: June 14, 2004
    ___________
    Before BYE, McMILLIAN, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    Janis Kreitinger (Kreitinger) pled guilty to credit card and wire fraud in
    violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1029(a)(2), 1343, and 3147(1). The district court1
    sentenced Kreitinger to a total term of 46 months imprisonment to be followed by
    concurrent 3- and 5-year terms of supervised release. The court also ordered
    Kreitinger to pay restitution of $1,881.03. Kreitinger appeals. Her counsel has filed
    a brief and moved to withdraw under Anders v. California, 
    386 U.S. 738
    (1967), and
    Kreitinger has filed a pro se supplemental brief.
    After careful review, we reject counsel’s argument that the court plainly erred
    in failing to determine Kreitinger’s understanding of applicable Guidelines
    enhancements. See United States v. Vonn, 
    535 U.S. 55
    , 58-59 (2002) (defendant who
    allows Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 error to pass without objection in trial
    court must satisfy plain-error rule, i.e., that claimed plain error affected defendant’s
    substantial rights); United States v. Bond, 
    135 F.3d 1247
    , 1248 (8th Cir.) (per curiam)
    (at plea hearing, district court not obligated to inform defendant of applicable
    Guidelines range or actual sentence), cert. denied, 
    524 U.S. 961
    (1998). Kreitinger’s
    claims of ineffective assistance are not properly before us. See United States v.
    Martin, 
    59 F.3d 767
    , 771 (8th Cir. 1995).
    Having found no nonfrivolous issues after reviewing the record as required
    under Penson v. Ohio, 
    488 U.S. 75
    , 80 (1988), we affirm. We also grant counsel’s
    motion to withdraw, and we deny Kreitinger’s motion for new counsel.
    ______________________________
    1
    The Honorable Linda R. Reade, United States District Judge for the Northern
    District of Iowa.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 03-2988

Judges: Bye, McMillian, Per Curiam, Riley

Filed Date: 6/14/2004

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024