United States v. Hermosillo-Banuelos , 98 F. App'x 576 ( 2004 )


Menu:
  •                     United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    ___________
    No. 03-3467
    ___________
    United States of America,           *
    *
    Appellee,               *
    * Appeal from the United States
    v.                            * District Court for the
    * District of Minnesota.
    Jose Cruz Hermosillo-Banuelos,      *
    * [UNPUBLISHED]
    Appellant.              *
    ___________
    Submitted: May 25, 2004
    Filed: June 1, 2004
    ___________
    Before MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, FAGG, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    Jose Cruz Hermosillo-Banuelos appeals the sentence the district court1 imposed
    after he pleaded guilty to conspiring to distribute more than 500 grams of a mixture
    or substance containing methamphetamine, in violation of 
    21 U.S.C. § 846
    .
    Hermosillo-Banuelos argues the district court clearly erred in denying him a minor-
    participant reduction under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2. See United States v. Lopez-Arce, 
    267 F.3d 775
    , 784 (8th Cir. 2001) (standard of review).
    1
    The Honorable James M. Rosenbaum, Chief Judge, United States District
    Court for the District of Minnesota.
    We find no clear error, because Hermosillo-Banuelos knew that he was
    transporting drugs, the transaction involved a significant quantity, and he was to
    receive $1,000 for his role in the transaction. See U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2, comment. (n.5)
    (minor participant means “a defendant . . . who is less culpable than most other
    participants, but whose role could not be described as minimal”); United States v.
    Santos-Garcia, 
    313 F.3d 1073
    , 1081 (8th Cir. 2002) (role as courier does not
    automatically entitle defendant to downward adjustment); cf. United States v. Ortiz,
    
    236 F.3d 420
    , 422 (8th Cir. 2001) (affirming denial of minor-participant reduction
    where defendant drove car used for transporting drugs and seemed quite aware of
    what was happening during drug sale); United States v. Alverez, 
    235 F. 3d 1086
    ,
    1090-91 (8th Cir. 2000) (affirming denial of minor-participant reduction where
    defendant was aware of substantial quantity of narcotics in spare tire, and even
    though defendant may have only acted as courier, his sentence was based solely on
    quantity of drugs found in his vehicle), cert. denied, 
    532 U.S. 1031
     (2001).
    Accordingly, we affirm.
    ______________________________
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 03-3467

Citation Numbers: 98 F. App'x 576

Judges: Arnold, Fagg, Smith

Filed Date: 6/1/2004

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/6/2024