United States v. Madison Flowers ( 2005 )

United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 04-3986
___________
United States of America, *
*
Appellee, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* Eastern District of Arkansas.
Madison Flowers, Jr., also known as *
Madison Junior Flowers, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellant. *
___________
Submitted: December 7, 2005
Filed: December 12, 2005
___________
Before ARNOLD, FAGG, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Madison Flowers appeals the sentence the district court1 imposed after he
pleaded guilty to distributing cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1).
Flowers’s counsel has moved to withdraw and filed a brief under Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967); Flowers has filed a pro se supplemental brief.
1
The Honorable James M. Moody, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Arkansas.
We reject the arguments raised on appeal. A codefendant’s lesser sentence is
not sufficient reason for setting aside Flowers’s sentence. See United States v. Pirani,
406 F.3d 543, 549 (8th Cir.) (en banc) (plain-error standard of review for unpreserved
error), cert. denied,126 S. Ct. 266 (2005); United States v. Buckendahl, 251 F.3d 753,
758-59 (8th Cir.) (noting that sentencing disparities between coconspirators do not
serve as proper basis for sentence reduction), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1049 (2001). Any
claim of ineffective assistance of counsel should be raised in 28 U.S.C. § 2255proceedings. See United States v. Hughes, 330 F.3d 1068, 1069 (8th Cir. 2003).
Having reviewed the record independently pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488
U.S. 75 (1988), we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues for appeal.
Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court, and we grant counsel’s
motion to withdraw.
______________________________
-2-