Harris v. Correctional Medical Services , 225 F. App'x 411 ( 2007 )


Menu:
  •                    United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    ___________
    No. 05-4082
    ___________
    John M. Harris,                        *
    *
    Appellant,                *
    * Appeal from the United States
    v.                               * District Court for the Eastern
    * District of Arkansas.
    Correctional Medical Services;         *
    * [UNPUBLISHED]
    Defendant,                *
    *
    Shirley Crawford, Nurse, East          *
    Arkansas Regional Unit, Arkansas       *
    Department of Correction;              *
    *
    Appellee,                 *
    *
    Duong Ly, Dr., originally sued as Ly, *
    *
    Defendant.                *
    ___________
    Submitted: May 22, 2007
    Filed: May 29, 2007
    ___________
    Before COLLOTON, BEAM, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    Arkansas inmate John Harris appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of his 
    42 U.S.C. § 1983
     action following an evidentiary hearing. Because Harris did not make
    a jury demand, we review the district court’s factual findings for clear error and its
    conclusions of law de novo. See Choate v. Lockhart, 
    7 F.3d 1370
    , 1373 & n.1 (8th
    Cir. 1993). Harris claimed that Nurse Shirley Crawford was deliberately indifferent
    to his serious medical need when she administered a TB skin-injection test to him,
    even though she knew he would have a positive reaction, and that she did not properly
    treat his arm in the days following the injection. He claimed that his arm became
    swollen, red, and painful, and that he has a permanent scar from the injection. We
    agree with the district court that Harris did not show the TB test posed a substantial
    risk of serious harm, see Farmer v. Brennan, 
    511 U.S. 825
    , 832-33, 837 (1994);
    Helling v. McKinney, 
    509 U.S. 25
    , 36 (1993), and that Harris did not show Crawford
    denied him proper treatment in the days following the injection, see Estelle v. Gamble,
    
    429 U.S. 97
    , 106 (1976).
    Accordingly, we affirm.
    ______________________________
    1
    The Honorable William R. Wilson, United States District Judge for the Eastern
    District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable
    Henry L. Jones, Jr., United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of
    Arkansas.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 05-4082

Citation Numbers: 225 F. App'x 411

Judges: Colloton, Beam, Benton

Filed Date: 5/29/2007

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024