Michael Clavier v. Unknown Goodson , 232 F. App'x 616 ( 2007 )


Menu:
  •                      United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    ___________
    No. 06-1509
    ___________
    Michael Clavier,                          *
    *
    Appellant,                   *
    *   Appeal from the United States
    v.                                  *   District Court for the Eastern
    *   District of Missouri.
    Unknown Goodson, Sgt.; Unknown            *
    Wilson, Lt.; Unknown Toppins, Lt.,        *   [UNPUBLISHED]
    in their individual and official          *
    capacities,                               *
    *
    Appellees.                   *
    ___________
    Submitted: May10, 2007
    Filed: May 21, 2007
    ___________
    Before SMITH, GRUENDER, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    Missouri inmate Michael Clavier appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of his
    
    42 U.S.C. § 1983
     action against three correctional officers in their individual and
    official capacities. Clavier alleged that, based on their incorrect belief that he had
    1
    The Honorable Catherine D. Perry, United States District Judge for the Eastern
    District of Missouri.
    ingested drugs during a prison visit, defendants gave him a choice between drinking
    water to induce vomiting or spending time in a “dry cell” (a cell without plumbing);
    he chose the vomiting option to avoid spending several days handcuffed in a dry cell,
    and as a result he suffered a sore throat and bruised muscle. Clavier claimed, as
    relevant to this appeal, that defendants’ actions violated his Eighth Amendment rights,
    and he requested damages and injunctive relief.
    We conclude that dismissal was proper because defendants’ actions did not
    amount to an Eighth Amendment violation. See Whitley v. Albers, 
    475 U.S. 312
    , 319
    (1986) (only unnecessary and wanton infliction of pain constitutes cruel and unusual
    punishment forbidden by Eighth Amendment); Avalos v. City of Glenwood, 
    382 F.3d 792
    , 798 (8th Cir. 2004) (if no constitutional right has been violated, further inquiry
    regarding qualified immunity is unnecessary). Clavier’s remaining arguments are
    without merit.
    Accordingly, we affirm.
    ______________________________
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 06-1509

Citation Numbers: 232 F. App'x 616

Judges: Smith, Gruender, Shepherd

Filed Date: 5/21/2007

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024