Gerry C. DuBose v. Jennifer L. Carey ( 2009 )


Menu:
  •                      United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    ___________
    No. 09-1050
    ___________
    Gerry C. DuBose,                         *
    *
    Appellant,                  *
    * Appeal from the United States
    v.                                * District Court for the
    * District of Minnesota.
    Jennifer L. Carey; John D. Kelly; Hanft, *
    Fride, O’Brien, Harries, Swelbar &       * [UNPUBLISHED]
    Burns, P.A.,                             *
    *
    Appellees.                  *
    ___________
    Submitted: June 4, 2009
    Filed: June 8, 2009
    ___________
    Before RILEY, SMITH, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    Nearly two years after this court affirmed the adverse judgment in Gerry
    DuBose’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against Jennifer Carey, John Kelly, and their law
    firm, see DuBose v. Carey, 204 Fed. Appx. 579 (8th Cir. Nov. 9, 2006) (unpublished
    per curiam), DuBose filed a motion for relief under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
    60(b), restating theories he had advanced earlier without success. The district court1
    1
    The Honorable Joan N. Ericksen, United States District Judge for the District
    of Minnesota.
    denied DuBose’s motion, finding it untimely and without merit. He appeals, and,
    following careful review, we find no abuse of discretion. See Middleton v.
    McDonald, 
    388 F.3d 614
    , 616 (8th Cir. 2004) (standard of review).
    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See 8th Cir.
    R. 47B.
    ______________________________
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 09-1050

Judges: Benton, Per Curiam, Riley, Smith

Filed Date: 6/8/2009

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024