Joseph Feldpausch v. Michael J. Astrue , 354 F. App'x 267 ( 2009 )


Menu:
  •                      United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    ___________
    No. 08-2078
    ___________
    Joseph L. Feldpausch,                 *
    *
    Appellant,                *
    * Appeal from the United States
    v.                              * District Court for the
    * Northern District of Iowa.
    Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of    *
    Social Security,                      *      [UNPUBLISHED]
    *
    Appellee.                 *
    ___________
    Submitted: December 1, 2009
    Filed: December 4, 2009
    ___________
    Before WOLLMAN, RILEY, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    Joseph Feldpausch (Feldpausch) appeals the district court’s1 order affirming the
    denial of disability insurance benefits. His August 2003 application for benefits
    alleged a disability onset date of July 1, 1985, as a result of ulcers, migraines, sleep
    apnea, night cramps, fatigue, back problems, and pain in his right foot, ankle, and leg.
    Following a hearing, an administrative law judge (ALJ) determined Feldpausch was
    1
    The Honorable Jon Stuart Scoles, United States Magistrate Judge for the
    Northern District of Iowa, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by
    consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).
    not disabled withing the meaning of the Social Security Act before the expiration of
    his insured status in March 1992. The ALJ relied in part on the testimony of a
    vocational expert (VE) about the existence of a significant number of jobs Feldpausch
    could be expected to perform. After careful de novo review, we find substantial
    evidence in the record as a whole supports the ALJ’s determination. See Cox v.
    Barnhart, 
    471 F.3d 902
    , 906-07 (8th Cir. 2006) (standard of review; explaining, to be
    entitled to benefits, a claimant needs to prove she was disabled before her insurance
    expired); Hilkemeyer v. Barnhart, 
    380 F.3d 441
    , 447 (8th Cir. 2004) (deciding VE
    testimony constituted substantial evidence in support of the ALJ’s determination that
    claimant was not disabled).
    Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
    ______________________________
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 08-2078

Citation Numbers: 354 F. App'x 267

Judges: Wollman, Riley, Smith

Filed Date: 12/4/2009

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024