Michael Neudecker v. Shakopee Police Dept., etc. , 355 F. App'x 973 ( 2009 )


Menu:
  •                      United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    ___________
    No. 08-3286
    ___________
    Michael Neudecker,                       *
    *
    Appellant,                 *
    *
    v.                                 * Appeal from the United States
    * District Court for the
    Shakopee Police Department; Quality, * District of Minnesota.
    Lifestyles, Inc., doing business as      *
    Friendship Manor Health Care Center; * [UNPUBLISHED]
    Scott County Department of Human         *
    Services; Laurie McMillen; City          *
    of Shakopee; County of Scott,            *
    *
    Appellees.                 *
    ___________
    Submitted: October 13, 2009
    Filed: December 11, 2009
    ___________
    Before MURPHY, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    In this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, Michael Neudecker appeals the district court’s1
    adverse judgment based partially on a dismissal for failure to state a claim and
    1
    The Honorable Patrick J. Schiltz, United States District Judge for the District
    of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Jeanne J.
    Graham, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.
    partially on summary judgment. Upon de novo review, see Schaaf v. Residential
    Funding Corp., 
    517 F.3d 544
    , 549 (8th Cir.) (Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6)), cert. denied,
    
    129 S. Ct. 222
    (2008); Gordon v. Shafer Contracting Co., 
    469 F.3d 1191
    , 1194 (8th
    Cir. 2006) (summary judgment), we agree with the district court’s disposition. In
    addition, we hold that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying
    Neudecker appointed counsel, see Phillips v. Jasper County Jail, 
    437 F.3d 791
    , 794
    (8th Cir. 2006) (standard of review; no statutory or constitutional right to appointed
    counsel in civil cases), and that none of the district court’s other rulings constituted
    reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
    ______________________________
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 08-3286

Citation Numbers: 355 F. App'x 973

Judges: Murphy, Colloton, Shepherd

Filed Date: 12/11/2009

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024