Weber v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 124 , 685 F. App'x 502 ( 2017 )


Menu:
  •                 United States Court of Appeals
    For the Eighth Circuit
    ___________________________
    No. 16-3252
    ___________________________
    Darryl L. Weber
    lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
    v.
    International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 124; Apprenticeship &
    Board Members & Companies; R.F. Fisher Electric Co.; Thomas Ferman; Gavin Sealy
    lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees
    ____________
    Appeal from United States District Court
    for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City
    ____________
    Submitted: April 20, 2017
    Filed: May 3, 2017
    [Unpublished]
    ____________
    Before COLLOTON, BOWMAN, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
    ____________
    PER CURIAM.
    Darryl Weber appeals after the District Court,1 upon motion, dismissed his
    employment action with prejudice as a sanction for failure to comply with a court
    order to provide discovery responses. Weber, without explanation, failed to comply
    with the court’s order to provide supplemental discovery responses, and the record
    reveals other instances of Weber’s failure to cooperate in the discovery process, even
    after he was given multiple opportunities to do so. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(d)(1)(A)(ii)
    (stating that the court may order sanctions if “a party, after being properly served with
    interrogatories . . . , fails to serve its answers, objections, or written response”); see
    also 37(d)(3), (b)(2)(A)(v) (explaining that sanctions may include an order dismissing
    the action); 41(b) (stating that a defendant may move to dismiss if the plaintiff fails
    to comply with court rules or a court order). We conclude that the District Court did
    not abuse its discretion. See Smith v. Gold Dust Casino, 
    526 F.3d 402
    , 404–05 (8th
    Cir. 2008) (reviewing a Rule 41(b) dismissal for an abuse of discretion); Int’l Bhd.
    of Elec. Workers, Local Union No. 545 v. Hope Elec. Corp., 
    380 F.3d 1084
    , 1105
    (8th Cir. 2004) (discussing appellate review of a Rule 37 sanction).
    We affirm the judgment of the District Court.
    ______________________________
    1
    The Honorable Roseann A. Ketchmark, United States District Judge for the
    Western District of Missouri.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 16-3252

Citation Numbers: 685 F. App'x 502

Judges: Colloton, Bowman, Kelly

Filed Date: 5/3/2017

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/6/2024