Rancho Holdings, LLC v. Manzanillo Associates, Ltd. ( 2011 )


Menu:
  •                      United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    ___________
    No. 11-1770
    ___________
    Rancho Holdings, LLC,                      *
    *
    Appellant,                    *
    *
    v.                                   *    Appeal from United States
    *    District Court for the
    Manzanillo Associates, LTD;                *    Western District of Missouri.
    T.F. Stone Companies, Inc.;                *
    Tommy F. Stone; Bruce Martin Myers,        *        [UNPUBLISHED]
    *
    Appellees.                    *
    ___________
    Submitted: October 19, 2011
    Filed: November 1, 2011
    ___________
    Before MELLOY, BOWMAN and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    Rancho Holdings, LLC appeals the district court’s1 order denying its request for
    a foreign antisuit injunction. We affirm.
    1
    The Honorable John T. Maughmer, United States Magistrate Judge for the
    Western District of Missouri, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by
    consent of the parties pursuant to 
    28 U.S.C. § 636
    (c).
    Foreign antisuit injunctions should be issued only in the rarest of cases. See
    Goss Int’l Corp. v. Man Roland Druckmaschinen Aktiengesellschaft, 
    491 F.3d 355
    ,
    359-60 (8th Cir. 2007). In this case, United States courts are being asked to prevent
    a party from seeking a remedy solely available in the foreign jurisdiction. See 
    id. at 365
    . Defendants are seeking to protect their property interest in Costa Rica by
    attaching the equivalent of a lis pendens to the property. The merits of the underlying
    litigation are not at issue. Therefore, a foreign antisuit injunction is not warranted at
    this time. See Quaak v. Klynveld Peat Marwick Goerdeler Bedrijfsrevisoren, 
    361 F.3d 11
    , 18 (1st Cir. 2004) (noting in consideration of foreign antisuit injunction:
    “The gatekeeping inquiry is, of course, whether parallel suits involve the same parties
    and issues. Unless that condition is met, a court ordinarily should go no further and
    refuse the issuance of an international antisuit injunction.”). If parallel litigation on
    the merits goes forward in Costa Rica, Rancho Holdings may renew its motion for an
    antisuit injunction with the district court.
    ______________________________
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 11-1770

Judges: Melloy, Bowman, Shepherd

Filed Date: 11/1/2011

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024