United States Ex Rel. Crow Creek Sioux Tribe v. Farms , 237 F.3d 919 ( 2000 )


Menu:
  •                     United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    ___________
    No. 00-1691
    ___________
    United States of America, ex rel        *
    Crow Creek Sioux Tribe, doing           *
    business as Crow Creek Farm             *
    Enterprises; Dacotah Farms; Crow        *
    Creek Farms; William Shields, Jr., a    *
    member of the Crow Creek Sioux          *
    Tribe, Individually,                    * Appeal from the United States
    * District Court for the District
    Appellees,           * of South Dakota.
    *
    v.                                *       [PUBLISHED]
    *
    Hattum Family Farms; Hattum             *
    Custom Farms; Robert Hattum,            *
    *
    Appellants.          *
    ___________
    Submitted: December 11, 2000
    Filed: December 19, 2000
    ___________
    Before LOKEN, HEANEY, and FAGG, Circuit Judges.
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    Robert Hattum and Hattum Family Farms performed custom farmwork for the
    Crow Creek Sioux Tribe on tribal land. The Tribe brought a qui tam action against
    Hattum, seeking to set aside certain crop liens, to require an accounting of payments
    Hattum received from the Tribe, and to recover for damages to tribal land. In a
    counterclaim, Hattum sought damages for unpaid salaries, amounts due under the
    farming agreements, unjust enrichment, and breach of contract. The district court
    partially granted the Tribe's motion for summary judgment, concluding the contracts
    were void under 
    25 U.S.C. § 81
     because the Secretary of the Interior had not approved
    them. See United States ex rel. Crow Creek Sioux Tribe v. Hattum Family Farms, 
    102 F. Supp. 2d 1154
    , 1163-64 (S.D. 2000). The district court also concluded the crop lien
    was void, and found Hattum's affirmative defenses of estoppel, waiver, unjust
    enrichment, and breach of contract without merit. See 
    id. at 1166
    . On appeal, Hattum
    challenges the district court's application of 
    25 U.S.C. § 81
     to the contracts and the
    court's finding that Hattum's affirmative defenses are meritless. Having carefully
    reviewed the case, we conclude the district court properly granted summary judgment
    and affirm on the basis of the district court's thorough opinion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
    A true copy.
    Attest:
    CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 00-1691

Citation Numbers: 237 F.3d 919

Judges: Loken, Heaney, Fagg

Filed Date: 12/19/2000

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/4/2024