United States v. Alejandro Lopez-Placencia , 491 F. App'x 775 ( 2012 )


Menu:
  •                  United States Court of Appeals
    For the Eighth Circuit
    ___________________________
    No. 12-1296
    ___________________________
    United States of America
    lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee
    v.
    Alejandro Lopez-Placencia
    lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant
    ____________
    Appeal from United States District Court
    for the Western District of Arkansas - Ft. Smith
    ____________
    Submitted: July 13, 2012
    Filed: November 2, 2012
    [Unpublished]
    ____________
    Before WOLLMAN, MELLOY, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
    ____________
    PER CURIAM.
    Alejandro Lopez-Placencia pleaded guilty to possessing methamphetamine
    with intent to distribute. See 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A)(viii); 18 U.S.C. § 2.
    Varying downward from the applicable advisory Guidelines range, the district court1
    sentenced him to 120 months in prison (the statutory minimum). On appeal, his
    counsel has moved to withdraw and filed a brief under Anders v. California, 
    386 U.S. 738
     (1967).
    We conclude that the district court committed no significant procedural error
    in sentencing Lopez-Placencia, and that the sentence was substantively reasonable.
    See United States v. Farmer, 
    647 F.3d 1175
    , 1178 (8th Cir. 2011) (describing
    appellate review); United States v. Chacon, 
    330 F.3d 1065
    , 1066 (8th Cir. 2003) (only
    authority to depart from statutory minimum sentence is in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(e) and
    (f), which apply when government moves for substantial-assistance departure or
    defendant qualifies for safety-valve relief); see also United States v. Barrera, 
    562 F.3d 899
    , 902-03 (8th Cir. 2009) (district court may not adjust defendant’s criminal-history
    score to provide § 3553(f) relief).
    Having independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 
    488 U.S. 75
    (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the
    district court and grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, subject to counsel informing
    appellant about procedures for seeking rehearing or filing a petition for certiorari.
    ______________________________
    1
    The Honorable Robert T. Dawson, United States District Judge for the
    Western District of Arkansas.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 12-1296

Citation Numbers: 491 F. App'x 775

Judges: Wollman, Melloy, Shepherd

Filed Date: 11/2/2012

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/6/2024