United States v. Abrorkhodja Askarkhodjaev , 444 F. App'x 105 ( 2011 )


Menu:
  •                      United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    ___________
    No. 11-2111
    ___________
    United States of America,            *
    *
    Appellee,                 *
    * Appeal from the United States
    v.                             * District Court for the
    * Western District of Missouri.
    Abrorkhodja Askarkhodjaev, also      *
    known as Alex, also known as         *        [UNPUBLISHED]
    Abdumajid Maksudov, also known       *
    as Abror,                            *
    *
    Appellant.                *
    ___________
    Submitted: December 20, 2011
    Filed: December 23, 2011
    ___________
    Before MURPHY, ARNOLD, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    Under the terms of a written plea agreement that contained an appeal waiver,
    Abrorkhodja Askarkhodjaev pleaded guilty to conspiracy to engage in racketeering,
    in violation of 
    18 U.S.C. § 1962
    (d); fraud in foreign labor contracting, in violation
    of 
    18 U.S.C. §§ 1351
     and 1349; identity theft, in violation of 
    18 U.S.C. § 1028
    (a)(7);
    and evasion of corporate employment tax, in violation of 
    26 U.S.C. § 7201
    . The
    district court1 imposed a sentence of 144 months in prison, 3 years of supervised
    release, and $1,007,492.28 in restitution. Mr. Askarkhodjaev filed a pro se notice of
    appeal, and his counsel has submitted a brief under Anders v. California, 
    386 U.S. 738
     (1967), in which he moves to withdraw. In a pro se filing before this court,
    Mr. Askarkhodjaev asserts that he received ineffective assistance of counsel.
    We conclude that Mr. Askarkhodjaev’s claim of ineffective assistance is not
    barred by the appeal waiver, but also is not appropriate for consideration on direct
    appeal. See United States v. McAdory, 
    501 F.3d 868
    , 872 (8th Cir. 2007). We
    further conclude that the appeal waiver should be enforced as to all other issues in
    this appeal. See United States v. Andis, 
    333 F.3d 886
    , 889-92 (8th Cir. 2003) (en
    banc) (court should enforce appeal waiver and dismiss appeal where appeal falls
    within scope of waiver, both plea agreement and waiver were entered into knowingly
    and voluntarily, and no miscarriage of justice would result); see also United States v.
    Estrada-Bahena, 
    201 F.3d 1070
    , 1071 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam) (enforcing appeal
    waiver in Anders case).
    Having independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 
    488 U.S. 75
    (1988), we have found no nonfrivolous issue not covered by the waiver.
    Accordingly, we decline to consider Mr. Askarkhodjaev’s ineffective-assistance
    claim, we dismiss this appeal, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, subject to
    counsel informing Mr. Askarkhodjaev about procedures for seeking rehearing or
    filing a petition for certiorari.
    ______________________________
    1
    The Honorable Ortrie D. Smith, United States District Judge for the Western
    District of Missouri.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 11-2111

Citation Numbers: 444 F. App'x 105

Judges: Murphy, Arnold, Benton

Filed Date: 12/23/2011

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024