United States v. Francisco Gomez , 452 F. App'x 706 ( 2012 )


Menu:
  •                     United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    ___________
    No. 11-2765
    ___________
    United States of America,            *
    *
    Appellee,                *
    * Appeal from the United States
    v.                             * District Court for the
    * Western District of Arkansas.
    Francisco Gomez, also known as       *
    Francisco Mateo-Gomez, also known *         [UNPUBLISHED]
    as Mario Hernandez, also known as    *
    Francisco Mateo,                     *
    *
    Appellant.               *
    ___________
    Submitted: February 22, 2012
    Filed: February 23, 2012
    ___________
    Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    Francisco Gomez pleaded guilty to illegally re-entering the United States after
    being deported following the commission of an aggravated felony, in violation of 
    8 U.S.C. § 1326
    (a), (b)(2). The district court1 sentenced Gomez to serve 46 months in
    prison and 3 years of supervised release, and ordered him to pay a $3,000 fine.
    1
    The Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren, Chief Judge, United States District Court
    for the Western District of Arkansas.
    Gomez then filed this appeal, in which his counsel has moved to withdraw and has
    submitted a brief under Anders v. California, 
    386 U.S. 738
     (1967), challenging the
    reasonableness of the prison sentence. We apply a presumption of reasonableness to
    the prison sentence, which falls at the bottom of the advisory Guidelines range, and
    we conclude that Gomez has failed to rebut that presumption. See Gall v. United
    States, 
    552 U.S. 38
    , 51 (2007). Accordingly, the substantive-reasonableness
    challenge fails.
    We have also reviewed the record for nonfrivolous issues, as required under
    Penson v. Ohio, 
    488 U.S. 75
    , 80 (1988), and we find no such issues on this record.
    Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed, and we grant counsel’s
    motion to withdraw.
    ______________________________
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 11-2765

Citation Numbers: 452 F. App'x 706

Judges: Loken, Bowman, Benton

Filed Date: 2/27/2012

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024