UHR v. Responsible Hospitality Institute, Inc. ( 2012 )


Menu:
  •                     United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    ___________
    No. 11-3184
    ___________
    Steven E. Uhr,                           *
    *
    Plaintiff - Appellant,     *
    *   Appeal from the United States
    v.                                *   District Court for the
    *   District of Minnesota.
    Responsible Hospitality Institute, Inc.; *
    Jim Peters; Diageo North America, Inc.; *      [UNPUBLISHED]
    Gary Zizka; American Beverage            *
    Licensees, Inc.; John D. Bodnivich;      *
    Distilled Spirits Council of the United *
    States, Inc.; Wine and Spirits Whole- *
    salers of America, Inc.; International   *
    Downtown Association; Applebee's         *
    International, Inc.; Famous Dave's of    *
    America, Inc.; Chili's of Minnesota,     *
    Inc.; Luby's Fuddruckers Restaurants, *
    LLC; Prudential Financial, Inc.;         *
    Citibank, N.A.; Richard A. Yoast;        *
    James F. Mosher; Robert Bruininks;       *
    National Beer Wholesalers Association; *
    Richard Lyshek; Rick Petri,              *
    *
    Defendants - Appellees,    *
    *
    Jay Wanserski,                           *
    *
    Defendant.                 *
    ___________
    Submitted: May 15, 2012
    Filed: July 17, 2012
    ___________
    Before RILEY, Chief Judge, SMITH and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    Steven E. Uhr appeals pro se from a final order entered in the United States
    District Court1 for the District of Minnesota granting the 22 named defendants'
    motions to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). In his
    second amended complaint, Uhr alleged that the defendants engaged in a nationwide
    price-fixing conspiracy to eliminate happy hours and other drink specials. According
    to Uhr, the defendants' alleged acts gave rise to claims under the Sherman Act, 
    15 U.S.C. § 1
    , and the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), 
    18 U.S.C. § 1962
    (c). The district court concluded that the second amended complaint
    failed to properly allege the existence of a conspiracy or any predicate acts of
    racketeering activity. Having carefully reviewed the record and the applicable legal
    principles, we find no error in the district court's disposition of this matter.
    Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47(B).
    ______________________________
    1
    The Honorable Patrick J. Schiltz, United States District Judge for the District
    of Minnesota.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 11-3184

Judges: Colloton, Per Curiam, Riley, Smith

Filed Date: 7/17/2012

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024