Anna Mae Skibinski v. Kathleen Sebelius ( 2012 )

United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 11-3709
___________
Anna Mae Skibinski, *
*
Appellant, * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the
v. * District of Minnesota.
*
Kathleen Sebelius, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: July 27, 2012
Filed: July 27, 2012
___________
Before BYE, GRUENDER, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Anna Mae Skibinski appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of her complaint
under 42 U.S.C. § 1395w-22(g)(5). Upon careful consideration of Skibinski’s
arguments for reversal, we find no basis for overturning the district court’s
determinations that Skibinski lacked standing to seek some of the relief she identified,
see Jones v. Gale, 470 F.3d 1261, 1265 (8th Cir. 2006) (reviewing de novo district
court’s determination as to standing); and that the sole basis for Skibinski’s challenge
to the decision to terminate coverage for post-hospital extended care services for her
1
The Honorable Paul A. Magnuson, United States District Judge for the District
of Minnesota.
now-deceased mother was not cognizable in this action, see McAdams v. McCord,
584 F.3d 1111, 1113 (8th Cir. 2009) (de novo review of dismissal for failure to state
claim). The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-