United States v. Maurice Jabbar White , 511 F. App'x 597 ( 2013 )


Menu:
  • United States Court of Appeals
    For the Eighth Circuit
    ___________________________
    No. 12-3650
    ___________________________
    United States of America
    lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee
    v.
    Maurice Jabbar White
    lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant
    ___________________________
    No. 12-3891
    ___________________________
    United States of America
    lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee
    v.
    Lendale Henry Thomas
    lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant
    ____________
    Appeal from United States District Court
    for the District of Minnesota - St. Paul
    ____________
    Submitted: June 10, 2013
    Filed: July 1, 2013
    [Unpublished]
    ____________
    Before LOKEN, BEAM, and BYE, Circuit Judges.
    ____________
    PER CURIAM.
    Lendale Henry Thomas and Maurice Jabbar White appeal the denial of their
    motions to reduce their sentences. We affirm.
    Thomas and White were members of the criminal “Rolling 30s Bloods”
    (“RTB”) street gang.1 The RTB sold drugs in South Minneapolis twenty-four hours
    a day, seven days a week, between 1992 and 2007, distributing at least 50 kilograms
    of cocaine base during that time.
    In 2007, the government charged Thomas, White, and ten other co-defendants
    with conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute 50 grams or more of cocaine base
    in violation of 
    21 U.S.C. §§ 846
     and 841(a)(1). Thomas and White entered into
    separate plea agreements in which each admitted to conspiring to distribute between
    1.5 and 4.5 kilograms of cocaine base, which corresponded at the time to a base
    offense level of 36. The district court2 sentenced White to 152 months and Thomas
    to 195 months of incarceration.
    1
    White was a member of the RTB from 1991 to 2005. Thomas was a member
    from 1991 to 2007.
    2
    The Honorable Donovan W. Frank, United States District Judge for the
    District of Minnesota.
    -2-
    In 2010, the United States Sentencing Guidelines (U.S.S.G.) applicable to
    cocaine base were amended such that the range of 1.5 to 4.5 kilograms now spans two
    offense levels. Under the amendment, being responsible for between 840 grams and
    2.8 kilograms of cocaine base corresponds to a base offense level of 34. U.S.S.G.
    § 2D1.1(c)(2). Also, being responsible for 2.8 to 8.4 kilograms corresponds to a base
    offense level of 36. Id. § 2D1.1(c)(3).
    Thomas and White each moved for a reduction of their respective sentences
    pursuant to 
    18 U.S.C. § 3582
    (c), asserting their appropriate base offense level would
    now be 34 because of each having been responsible for less than 2.8 kilograms of
    cocaine base. Based in part on findings of fact made after the trial of one of their
    co-defendants, the district court determined Thomas and White had each been
    responsible for more than 2.8 kilograms of cocaine base and denied the motions.
    They each appealed.
    On appeal, Thomas and White contend the district court erred in relying on the
    findings from their co-defendant’s trial. “At sentencing, a district court ‘may consider
    relevant information without regard to its admissibility under the rules of evidence
    applicable at trial, provided that the information has sufficient indicia of reliability
    to support its probable accuracy.’”• United States v. Woods, 
    596 F.3d 445
    , 447-48
    (8th Cir. 2010) (quoting U.S.S.G. § 6A1.3(a)). Whether “evidence is sufficiently
    reliable to support a sentencing decision depends on the facts of the particular case,
    and is committed to the sound discretion of the district court.”• Id. at 48 (quoting
    United States v. Cassidy, 
    6 F.3d 554
    , 557 (8th Cir. 1993)). We find nothing in the
    record to indicate the district court abused its discretion in considering the findings
    of fact from the co-defendant’s trial.
    Thomas and White further contend the district court erred in finding each of
    them responsible for more than 2.8 kilograms of cocaine base. Reviewing the
    determination of drug quantity for clear error, United States v. Gonzalez-Rodriguez,
    -3-
    
    239 F.3d 948
    , 953 (8th Cir. 2001), we find none. The drug quantity attributable to
    a conspirator includes amounts which are reasonably foreseeable actions of other
    co-conspirators in furtherance of the conspiracy. U.S.S.G. § 1B1.3. Thomas and
    White were members of the RTB for over a decade during the period of around-the-
    clock drug sales in which its members distributed more than 50 kilograms of cocaine
    base. The district court did not clearly err in finding it was reasonably foreseeable
    that members of the RTB would possess at least 2.8 kilograms of cocaine base in
    furtherance of the conspiracy.
    The judgment of the district court is affirmed.
    ______________________________
    -4-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 12-3650, 12-3891

Citation Numbers: 511 F. App'x 597

Judges: Loken, Beam, Bye

Filed Date: 7/1/2013

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024