Iola Norene Bult v. Beadle County, SD ( 1995 )


Menu:
  •                               _____________
    No. 95-2048
    _____________
    IOLA NORENE BULT, Individually        *
    and as Special Administratix of       *
    Estate of CHARLES R. CHENEY,          *
    *   Appeal from the United States
    Appellee,                        *   District Court for the
    *   District of South Dakota.
    v.                               *
    *            [UNPUBLISHED]
    BEADLE COUNTY, a local                *
    governmental body; TOM BEERMAN,       *
    Individually and as Sheriff           *
    of Beadle County; LORI MEYERS,        *
    Individually and as Jailer for        *
    Beadle County; and unknown JOHN       *
    AND JANE DOES, Individually and       *
    in their Official Capacities as       *
    Employees of Beadle County,           *
    *
    Appellants.                      *
    __________
    Submitted:      November 17, 1995
    Filed:    December 5, 1995
    __________
    Before HANSEN, LAY, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.
    __________
    PER CURIAM.
    This is an interlocutory appeal arising out of a wrongful death
    action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and state law by appellee, Iola
    Norene Bult.   Her son, Charles R. Cheney, committed suicide while being
    held at the Beadle County Regional Corrections Center in Huron, South
    Dakota.   Appellants Beadle County, Sheriff Tom Beerman, and jailer Lori
    Meyers seek reversal of the order of
    the district court1 denying their motion for summary judgment based on
    qualified immunity and their motion to dismiss defendants Beerman and
    Beadle County for failure to state a claim.
    The district court concluded that the constitutional standard for
    deliberate indifference regarding liability for jail suicides was clearly
    established at the time of the suicide and that genuine issues of material
    fact exist as to whether the officials reasonably would have known that
    their actions and omissions would have violated that standard.
    After studying the record, we conclude the district court made no
    error of fact or law and that an opinion would lack precedential value.
    Its order denying summary judgment on the basis of qualified immunity is
    affirmed.   See 8th Cir. R. 47B.   The remainder of the appeal is dismissed
    for lack of jurisdiction.    See Johnson v. Jones, 
    115 S. Ct. 2151
    (1995);
    Swint v. Chambers County Com'n, 
    115 S. Ct. 1203
    (1995).
    A true copy.
    Attest:
    CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
    1
    The Honorable Lawrence L. Piersol, United States District
    Judge for the District of South Dakota.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 95-2048

Filed Date: 12/5/1995

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/17/2021