James E. Ramette v. Carolyn J. Alexander ( 1995 )


Menu:
  •                                 _____________
    No. 95-2090
    _____________
    James E. Ramette, Trustee             *
    of the Bankruptcy Estate of           *
    Ferris J. Alexander, Sr.,             *
    *   Appeal from the United States
    Appellee,                        *   District Court for the
    *   District of Minnesota.
    v.                               *
    *              [UNPUBLISHED]
    Carolyn J. Alexander, Jeffrey   *
    C. Alexander, Gust S. Alexander,*
    and U.S. Video, Inc.,
    *
    *
    Appellants.                      *
    __________
    Submitted:      November 13, 1995
    Filed:    December 1, 1995
    __________
    Before HANSEN, JOHN R. GIBSON, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.
    __________
    PER CURIAM.
    Appellants Carolyn J. Alexander, Jeffrey C. Alexander, Gust S.
    Alexander and U.S. Video, Inc., appeal from a final judgment entered after
    the district court1 affirmed orders of the bankruptcy court2 in favor of
    appellee James E. Ramette, the trustee.         The judgment represented the
    combined value of a promissory note and real estate property that were
    fraudulently transferred to his children by Ferris J. Alexander, Sr., the
    debtor, in 1989 while he
    1
    The Honorable James M. Rosenbaum, United States District
    Judge for the District of Minnesota.
    2
    The Honorable Nancy C. Dreher, United States Bankruptcy
    Judge for the District of Minnesota.
    was insolvent, but before he filed for bankruptcy.
    Appellants indicate in their reply brief that they "do not appeal the
    findings of fact," but rather "appeal from errors of law."   They argue that
    the transfers are not voidable, that the Alexander appellants are not
    jointly and severally liable for the transfers but only liable for the
    value each received, that evidence of present value is lacking, and that
    the amount of the judgment is incorrect.
    After a two day trial, the bankruptcy court issued detailed findings
    of fact and conclusions of law.      It found that the debtor owned and
    operated numerous adult movie theaters in addition to United States Video,
    Inc., a video rental business, in which his children were the stockholders.
    As a result of a federal investigation into the debtor's business affairs,
    he transferred to his children a note for no consideration and a $175,000
    Minneapolis real estate property for nominal consideration.    The note had
    a face value of $1.5 million, but the bankruptcy court found its actual
    value to be $535,000 at the time of the transfer.   The children were aware
    of the investigation and contributed the value of the note to U.S. Video
    as additional capital.   The debtor's assets at the time of the transfers
    were substantially less than the $12.3 million debts he owed.           The
    bankruptcy court concluded that both transfers were made with the intent
    to hinder, delay, and defraud the debtor's creditors, and were effected for
    less than reasonably equivalent value, within the meaning of Minn. Stat.
    §   513.41.   Based on "overwhelming" evidence, it concluded that the
    Alexander children (except for Susan J. Omoyayi) and U.S. Video were co-
    conspirators with their father in the fraudulent scheme and ordered
    judgment for the trustee.
    After carefully reviewing the record, we conclude that the bankruptcy
    court's findings, including those related to fraudulent transfer and
    valuation of property, are not clearly erroneous, and
    2
    its conclusions are not contrary to law.      Accordingly, we affirm the
    judgment in favor of the trustee without further discussion.   See 8th Cir.
    R. 47B.
    A true copy.
    Attest:
    CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 95-2090

Filed Date: 12/1/1995

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/17/2021