Roosevelt Holmes v. James A. Gammon ( 1996 )


Menu:
  •                                 _____________
    No. 95-2403
    _____________
    Roosevelt Holmes,                      *
    *
    Petitioner-Appellant,    *     Appeal from the United States
    *     District Court for the
    v.                                *     Eastern District of Missouri.
    *
    James A. Gammon,                       *           [UNPUBLISHED]
    *
    Respondent-Appellee.     *
    _____________
    Submitted:   April 10, 1996
    Filed: July 1, 1996
    _____________
    Before WOLLMAN, JOHN R. GIBSON, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.
    _____________
    PER CURIAM.
    Roosevelt Holmes appeals from a final judgment of the district court1
    dismissing with prejudice his 
    28 U.S.C. § 2254
     habeas corpus       petition.
    The magistrate judge to whom this case was referred recommended dismissing
    the petition on the basis that Holmes' first ground for relief was
    successive, that the second and third grounds for relief were abusive, and
    that Holmes had failed to establish cause and prejudice or actual innocence
    to overcome these procedural deficiencies.    The district court adopted the
    magistrate judge's opinion in its entirety and dismissed Holmes' petition.
    1
    The Honorable Edward L. Filippine, United States District
    Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri, adopting the report
    and recommendation of the Honorable Frederick R. Buckles, United
    States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.
    Although Holmes' court-appointed attorney filed an appellate brief,
    Holmes subsequently filed a motion to dismiss his counsel's brief and
    submitted a pro se appellate brief.    At oral argument, we permitted Holmes'
    court-appointed counsel to argue the points outlined in the pro se brief.
    We deny Holmes' pro se motion to strike the brief filed by his counsel.
    After carefully reviewing the record, we conclude that the district
    court properly dismissed Holmes' habeas corpus petition for the reasons set
    forth in the magistrate judge's well-reasoned opinion as adopted by the
    district court.   As no error in fact or law appears, we accordingly, affirm
    the judgment of the district court.     See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
    A true copy.
    Attest:
    CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 95-2403

Filed Date: 7/1/1996

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/17/2021