United States v. Raymond Gonzalez ( 1996 )


Menu:
  •                                     ___________
    No. 95-3778
    ___________
    United States of America,                *
    *
    Appellee,                  *
    *   Appeal from the United States
    v.                                  *   District Court for the
    *   Southern District of Iowa.
    Raymond Gonzalez,                        *
    *         [UNPUBLISHED]
    Appellant.                 *
    ___________
    Submitted:     August 1, 1996
    Filed:   August 8, 1996
    ___________
    Before BEAM, HANSEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    Raymond Gonzalez pleaded guilty to conspiring to distribute cocaine,
    and was sentenced to the mandatory minimum of 120 months imprisonment.       The
    government later moved to reduce the sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(e) and
    Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 35(b).            Within ten days after the
    district court1 granted that motion, Gonzalez filed a motion which the
    court construed as a motion to reconsider the extent of the sentence
    reduction; the court denied the motion.      Subsequently, Gonzalez moved for
    a further reduction in his sentence.      Again, the court denied the motion,
    and Gonzalez appeals.
    Gonzalez has not pointed to any source of authority for his latter
    motion, and under Rule 35(b), only the government may move for a reduction
    in sentence.    See Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(b).       Because
    1
    The Honorable R. E. Longstaff, United States District Judge
    for the Southern District of Iowa.
    Gonzalez did not timely appeal from the court's denial of his motion to
    reconsider, we dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.   See Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)
    (defendant in criminal case must file notice of appeal within ten days of
    court's entry of judgment); United States v. Ridl, 
    26 F.3d 73
    , 74 (8th Cir.
    1994) (motion for reconsideration filed within appeal period is timely and
    tolls running of time for filing appeal in criminal case); United States
    v. Petty, 
    82 F.3d 809
    , 810 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam) (timely filing of
    notice of appeal is both mandatory and jurisdictional).
    Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.
    A true copy.
    Attest:
    CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 95-3778

Filed Date: 8/8/1996

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021