United States v. Bobby Springston , 534 F. App'x 576 ( 2013 )


Menu:
  •                   United States Court of Appeals
    For the Eighth Circuit
    ___________________________
    No. 13-1624
    ___________________________
    United States of America
    lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee
    v.
    Bobby Lynn Springston
    lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant
    ____________
    Appeal from United States District Court
    for the Western District of Arkansas - Harrison
    ____________
    Submitted: September 23, 2013
    Filed: October 16, 2013
    [Unpublished]
    ____________
    Before LOKEN, COLLOTON, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
    ____________
    PER CURIAM.
    In 2009, Bobby Lynn Springston was charged with violating 
    18 U.S.C. § 2250
    by failing to register as a sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration and
    Notification Act (SORNA). Springston moved to dismiss the indictment arguing that
    SORNA violated the non-delegation doctrine. The district court1 denied the motion.
    Springston appealed. This court affirmed the conviction. United States v. Springston,
    
    650 F.3d 1153
    , 1157 (8th Cir. 2011). The decision in Reynolds v. United States, 
    132 S. Ct. 975
    , 984 (2012) necessitated a remand for consideration of the non-delegation
    issue. United States v. Springston, 
    480 Fed. Appx. 860
    , 861 (8th Cir. 2012). The
    district court denied the motion to dismiss, upholding SORNA’s constitutionality.
    On appeal, Springston again asserts that 
    42 U.S.C. § 16913
    (d) violates the non-
    delegation doctrine. While this appeal was pending, this court upheld the delegation
    in 
    42 U.S.C. § 16913
    (d) because Congress set forth an intelligible principle guiding
    the Attorney General’s exercise of authority. United States v. Kuehl, 
    706 F.3d 917
    ,
    920 (8th Cir. 2013). See Mistretta v. United States, 
    488 U.S. 361
    , 372 (1989)
    (Congress may delegate legislative authority to another body, provided a legislative
    act sets an intelligible principle for the exercise of the granted authority to which the
    authorized body must conform). The Kuehl case resolves Springston’s appeal.
    The judgment of the district court is affirmed.
    ______________________________
    1
    The Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren, United States District Judge for the
    Western District of Arkansas.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 13-1624

Citation Numbers: 534 F. App'x 576

Judges: Loken, Colloton, Benton

Filed Date: 10/16/2013

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024