The Hunte Corporation v. Jodell Martinelli , 446 F. App'x 818 ( 2011 )


Menu:
  •                      United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    ___________
    No. 11-1290
    ___________
    The Hunte Corporation,                 *
    *
    Appellee,                  *
    *
    v.                              * Appeal from the United States
    * District Court for the
    Jodell Martinelli; Stephanie Booth;    * Western District of Missouri.
    Melia Perry; Abbigail King; Nicole     *
    Kersanty; Ruth Ross; Elliot Moskow; *
    Karen Galatis,                         *
    * [UNPUBLISHED]
    Appellants.                *
    ___________
    Submitted: September 19, 2011
    Filed: December 29, 2011
    ___________
    Before RILEY, Chief Judge, COLLOTON and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    Elliot Moskow and Karen Galatis (collectively, “appellants”) served a
    subpoena on The Hunte Corporation (“Hunte”) to obtain discovery to aid them in
    certain litigation before the United States District Court for the District of Arizona.
    Hunte, as a non-party to the litigation in Arizona, sought a protective order, and the
    district court1 found “it appropriate to shift all reasonable and necessary costs Hunte
    incurs in complying with the subpoena” to appellants. Appellants filed a motion for
    partial reconsideration and suggested three factors for the district court to consider
    in determining whether appellants should bear the costs of discovery. The district
    court analyzed the issue using the three factors appellants suggested, but maintained
    its initial position that appellants must bear the costs of discovery. Appellants now
    appeal.
    We review discovery rulings for “gross abuse of discretion resulting in
    fundamental unfairness.” Sallis v. Univ. of Minn., 
    408 F.3d 470
    , 477 (8th Cir. 2005)
    (quoting Roberts v. Shawnee Mission Ford, Inc., 
    352 F.3d 358
    , 360 (8th Cir. 2003)).
    Having carefully reviewed the record and the arguments of the parties, we find no
    abuse of discretion. Therefore, we affirm, see 8th Cir. R. 47B, and deny Hunte’s
    motions to take judicial notice and enlarge the record on appeal.
    ______________________________
    1
    The Honorable Richard E. Dorr, United States District Judge for the Western
    District of Missouri.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 11-1290

Citation Numbers: 446 F. App'x 818

Judges: Riley, Colloton, Gruender

Filed Date: 12/29/2011

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024