Kevin Laughlin v. Ross Perot ( 1997 )


Menu:
  •                           United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    _____________
    No. 96-2676EM
    _____________
    Mark Dotzler;                           *
    *
    Plaintiff,                 *
    *
    Kevin Laughlin; Edward Dyck;            *
    Carrie Alspaw,                          *
    *
    Plaintiffs-Appellants,     *
    *
    v.                                *
    *
    Ross Perot; The Perot Petition          *
    Committee; Mark Alan Blahnik; The       *
    Calahan & Gibbons Group; U.S.           *
    Datalink, Inc.;                         *
    *   Appeals from the United States
    Defendants-Appellees,      *   District Court for the Eastern District
    *   of Missouri.
    Equifax Credit Information Services;    *
    *        [UNPUBLISHED]
    Defendant,                 *
    *
    TRW, Inc.;                              *
    *
    Defendant-Appellee,        *
    *
    Russ Melbye; Sandra Stone McClure,      *
    *
    Defendants.                   *
    ____________________                    *
    *
    Kevin Laughlin; Edward Dyck;           *
    Carrie Alspaw,                         *
    *
    Plaintiffs-Appellants,    *
    *
    v.                               *
    *
    Ross Perot; The Perot Petition         *
    Committee; Mark Alan Blahnik; The      *
    Calahan & Gibbons Group; U.S.          *
    Datalink, Inc.;                        *
    *
    Defendants-Appellees,     *
    *
    Equifax Credit Information Services;   *
    *
    Defendant,                *
    *
    TRW, Inc.;                             *
    *
    Defendant-Appellee,       *
    *
    Russ Melbye; Sandra Stone McClure,     *
    *
    Defendants.               *
    _____________
    No. 96-2677EM
    _____________
    Mark Dotzler;                          *
    *
    Plaintiff-Appellant,      *
    *
    Kevin Laughlin; Edward Dyck;           *
    Carrie Alspaw,                         *
    -2-
    Plaintiffs,              *
    *
    v.                               *
    *
    Ross Perot;                            *
    *
    Defendant-Appellee,      *
    *
    The Perot Petition Committee; Mark     *
    Alan Blahnik;                          *
    *
    Defendants,              *
    *
    The Calahan & Gibbons Group; U.S.      *
    Datalink, Inc.;                        *
    *
    Defendants-Appellees,    *
    *
    Equifax Credit Information Services;   *
    *
    Defendant,               *
    *
    TRW, Inc.;                             *
    *
    Defendant-Appellee,      *
    *
    Russ Melbye; Sandra Stone McClure,     *
    *
    Defendants.                  *
    ____________________                   *
    *
    Kevin Laughlin; Edward Dyck;           *
    Carrie Alspaw,                         *
    *
    Plaintiffs,              *
    *
    v.                               *
    -3-
    Ross Perot;                            *
    *
    Defendant-Appellee,       *
    *
    The Perot Petition Committee; Mark     *
    Alan Blahnik;                          *
    *
    Defendants,               *
    *
    The Calahan & Gibbons Group; U.S.      *
    Datalink, Inc.;                        *
    *
    Defendants-Appellees,     *
    *
    Equifax Credit Information Services;   *
    *
    Defendant,                *
    *
    TRW, Inc.;                             *
    *
    Defendant-Appellee,       *
    *
    Russ Melbye; Sandra Stone McClure, *
    *
    Defendants.               *
    _____________
    Submitted: August 21, 1997
    Filed: August 26, 1997
    _____________
    Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.
    _____________
    PER CURIAM.
    -4-
    Kevin Laughlin, Edward Dyck, Carrie Alspaw, and Mark Dotzler appeal the
    district court's orders dismissing for lack of personal jurisdiction their claims against
    Ross Perot, Mark Alan Blahnik, and The Calahan & Gibbons Group, and granting
    summary judgment in favor of U.S. Datalink, Inc. and TRW, Inc. See Dotzler v. Perot,
    
    899 F. Supp. 416
    (E.D. Mo. 1995); Dotzler v. Perot, 
    914 F. Supp. 328
    , 330 (E.D. Mo.
    1996). Although the district court's rulings did not dispose of all the claims and parties,
    the district court entered final judgment for these appellees under Federal Rule of Civil
    Procedure 54(b). Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties' briefs, we find
    no errors of law in the district court's analysis. We thus affirm the district court's
    rulings. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
    We deny the appellants' motions to supplement the record on appeal, and deny
    all other motions on appeal as moot.
    A true copy.
    Attest:
    CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
    -5-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 96-2676

Filed Date: 8/26/1997

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021