United States v. Gerardo G. Hernandez ( 1999 )


Menu:
  •                     United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    ___________
    No. 98-3326
    ___________
    United States of America,                *
    *
    Appellee,                   *
    * Appeal from the United States
    v.                                 * District Court for the
    * Western District of Arkansas.
    Gerardo Garcia Hernandez, also           *
    known as Gerardo Garcia,                 *       [UNPUBLISHED]
    *
    Appellant.                  *
    ___________
    Submitted: January 7, 1999
    Filed: January 20, 1999
    ___________
    Before McMILLIAN, RICHARD S. ARNOLD, and MORRIS SHEPPARD
    ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    Gerardo Garcia Hernandez (Mr. Garcia) pleaded guilty to distribution of
    methamphetamine, in violation of 
    21 U.S.C. § 841
    (a)(1). The district court1 sentenced
    Mr. Garcia to 70 months imprisonment and 5 years supervised release. Mr. Garcia
    appeals, and we affirm.
    1
    The Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren, Chief Judge, United States District Court
    for the Western District of Arkansas.
    For reversal, Mr. Garcia argues the district court erred in denying him a minimal
    or minor role reduction under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 3B1.2 (1998). At
    sentencing, a government witness testified that he observed Mr. Garcia enter a
    laundromat after a brief conversation with a confidential informant (CI) in the CI&s
    vehicle, and then return to the CI&s vehicle with a package containing 232 grams of
    actual methamphetamine. Additionally, Mr. Garcia testified that he contacted a
    supplier after agreeing to provide drugs for the CI, and that he expected to be
    compensated for his role in the transaction.
    Based on this testimony, we conclude the district court did not clearly err in
    concluding Mr. Garcia was neither a minor nor a minimal participant. Mr. Garcia does
    not dispute that he arranged the transaction, that he accompanied the source to the
    transaction, that he delivered the drugs to the CI, and that he expected to receive
    compensation. See United States v. Chatman, 
    119 F.3d 1335
    , 1341 (8th Cir.), cert.
    denied, 
    118 S. Ct. 434
     (1997); United States v. Harris, 
    974 F.2d 84
    , 86 (8th Cir. 1992).
    Accordingly, we affirm.
    A true copy.
    Attest:
    CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 98-3326

Filed Date: 1/20/1999

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021