United States v. Corey Benjamin ( 2013 )


Menu:
  •                   United States Court of Appeals
    For the Eighth Circuit
    ___________________________
    No. 12-2164
    ___________________________
    United States of America
    lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee
    v.
    Corey James Benjamin
    lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant
    ____________
    Appeal from United States District Court
    for the District of Minnesota - St. Paul
    ____________
    Submitted: February 13, 2013
    Filed: February 15, 2013
    [Unpublished]
    ____________
    Before LOKEN, MELLOY, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
    ____________
    PER CURIAM.
    Corey Benjamin appeals after he pled guilty to a firearm offense, in violation
    of 
    18 U.S.C. §§ 922
    (g)(1), 924(a)(2), and 924(e), and the district court1 sentenced him
    1
    The Honorable Richard H. Kyle, United States District Judge for the District
    of Minnesota.
    to fifteen years in prison, the statutory minimum. His counsel has filed a brief under
    Anders v. California, 
    386 U.S. 738
     (1967), requesting leave to withdraw.
    Benjamin’s own admissions at his change-of-plea hearing established that he
    had violated 
    18 U.S.C. § 922
    (g)(1), and that he had at least three previous convictions
    for separate offenses within the terms of 
    18 U.S.C. § 924
    (e). Thus, after carefully and
    independently reviewing the record in accordance with Penson v. Ohio, 
    488 U.S. 75
    (1988), we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues for review. See 
    18 U.S.C. § 924
    (e) (person who violates § 922(g)(1) and has three previous convictions for
    violent felony or serious drug offense, or both, committed on different occasions from
    one another, shall be imprisoned not less than 15 years); United States v. Watts, 
    553 F.3d 603
    , 604 (8th Cir. 2009) (per curiam) (“District courts lack the authority to
    reduce sentences below congressionally-mandated statutory minimums.”) (citation
    omitted).
    Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and we affirm.
    ______________________________
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 12-2164

Judges: Loken, Melloy, Benton

Filed Date: 2/15/2013

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/6/2024