Daniel Hurlbut v. Sheriff Tim Helder ( 2019 )

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 19-1193
___________________________
Daniel Bryce Hurlbut
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
Washington County Detention Center
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant
Sheriff Tim Helder; Karas Medical Team; Dr. Karas; Veronica Dockery; Ken
Hughes; Landon Harris; Regina Walker; Lieutenant Foster
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees
John Doe Deputies
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant
Deputy Josve Velasco; Deputy Skinkis; Deputy Uriel Paredes
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Western District of Arkansas - Fayetteville
____________
Submitted: September 6, 2019
Filed: September 11, 2019
[Unpublished]
____________
Before BENTON, KELLY, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
In this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, former inmate Daniel Bryce Hurlbut appeals
the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment. Viewing the record and all
reasonable inferences in Hurlbut’s favor, see Allard v. Baldwin, 779 F.3d 768, 771
(8th Cir. 2015) (de novo review), we find no error in the district court’s thorough
analysis of Hurlbut’s claims.2 The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
1
The Honorable P.K. Holmes, III, United States District Judge for the Western
District of Arkansas.
2
We lack jurisdiction to consider Hurlbut’s challenges to a magistrate judge’s
adverse rulings on nondispositive pretrial matters, because he did not timely object
to those orders below. See Daley v. Marriott Int’l, Inc., 415 F.3d 889, 893 n.9 (8th
Cir. 2005) (when parties do not consent to final disposition by magistrate, this court
lacks jurisdiction to consider direct appeal of magistrate’s order on nondispositive
pretrial matter).
-2-