United States v. Byron Scott Saul , 11 F. App'x 694 ( 2001 )


Menu:
  •                      United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    ___________
    No. 00-2809
    ___________
    United States of America,                *
    *
    Appellee,                   *
    *
    v.                                 * Appeal from the United States
    * District Court for the
    Byron Scott Saul,                        * District of Nebraska.
    *
    Appellant.                  *     [UNPUBLISHED]
    ___________
    Submitted: June 5, 2001
    Filed: June 12, 2001
    ___________
    Before HANSEN, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, and BYE, Circuit Judges.
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    Byron Scott Saul pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm, in
    violation of 
    18 U.S.C. § 922
    (g), and was sentenced to 96 months of imprisonment and
    3 years of supervised release. On appeal, he challenges the district court’s1 imposition
    of an enhancement for using the firearm in connection with another felony, and the
    court’s assessment of his criminal history.
    1
    The Honorable William G. Cambridge, United States District Judge for the
    District of Nebraska, now retired.
    We first conclude that the district court did not clearly err in applying the
    enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(5). See United States v. Rohwedder, 
    243 F.3d 423
    , 428 (8th Cir. 2001) (standard of review). The evidence presented at
    sentencing supported the court’s conclusion that Saul’s conduct satisfied the elements
    of the Nebraska felony of terroristic threats. See 
    Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-311.01
     (1995);
    State v. Tillman, 
    511 N.W.2d 128
    , 134 (Neb. Ct. App. 1993).
    Second, we conclude that the district court did not clearly err in assessing
    criminal history points for a 1981 theft conviction. See United States v. Levi, 
    229 F.3d 677
    , 679 (8th Cir. 2000) (standard of review). The evidence presented at sentencing
    supported the court’s determination that, within fifteen years of the date of his
    commission of the instant offense, Saul was serving a parole-revocation sentence
    arising from the theft conviction. See U.S.S.G. § 4A1.2(e)(1) and (k)(2)(B).
    Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.
    A true copy.
    Attest:
    CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 00-2809

Citation Numbers: 11 F. App'x 694

Judges: Hansen, Arnold, Bye

Filed Date: 6/12/2001

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024