Rickey Harrell v. G4S Secure Solutions, etc. , 578 F. App'x 616 ( 2014 )

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 14-1647
___________________________
Rickey Harrell; Joyce Harrell
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiffs - Appellants
v.
G4S Secure Solutions (USA), Inc., formerly known as Wackenhut Corp.
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of Nebraska - Omaha
____________
Submitted: September 22, 2014
Filed: September 25, 2014
[Unpublished]
____________
Before WOLLMAN, BYE, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Alabama residents Rickey and Joyce Harrell appeal from the district court’s1
order granting judgment on the pleadings and dismissing with prejudice their tort
1
The Honorable Laurie Smith Camp, Chief Judge, United States District Court
for the District of Nebraska.
claims against G4S Secure Solutions (USA), Inc. (G4S) in this diversity action.
Because the district court’s order did not address the counterclaims asserted by G4S
against the Harrells, there is no final order from which an appeal lies, and we lack
jurisdiction over the instant appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (appellate courts have
jurisdiction over appeals from final decisions of district courts); Miller v. Special
Weapons, L.L.C., 369 F.3d 1033, 1034 (8th Cir. 2004) (appellate court lacks
jurisdiction over judgment entered on complaint if counterclaim is pending when
notice of appeal is filed even when counterclaim rests on same legal theory as
resolved claims); Thomas v. Basham, 931 F.2d 521, 522-23 (8th Cir. 1991) (federal
appellate court has obligation to consider its own jurisdiction sua sponte even if
parties concede the issue). The appeal is dismissed as premature.
______________________________
-2-