Donald Nangle v. Kathy Surratt-States , 83 Fed. Appx. 141 ( 2003 )


Menu:
  •                      United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    ___________
    No. 03-1779
    ___________
    In re: Donald Nangle,                          *
    *
    Debtor.                         *
    ------------------------------------------     *
    *
    Donald Nangle,                                 *
    * Appeal from the United States
    Appellant,                      * Bankruptcy Appellate Panel
    * for the Eighth Circuit.
    v.                                     *
    *       [UNPUBLISHED]
    Leslie A. Davis,                               *
    *
    Appellee.                       *
    ___________
    Submitted: December 5, 2003
    Filed: December 12, 2003
    ___________
    Before RILEY, McMILLIAN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    Debtor Donald Nangle (Nangle) appeals from a bankruptcy appellate panel
    order concluding, alternatively, Nangle lacked standing to appeal the bankruptcy
    court’s1 order approving a settlement. Upon de novo review, see Park v. Forest Serv.,
    
    205 F.3d 1034
    , 1036 (8th Cir. 2000), we conclude that while Nangle had standing to
    object in the bankruptcy court to the settlement agreement, see Fed. R. Bankr. P.
    2002(a)(3); In re Thompson, 
    965 F.2d 1136
    , 1140 (1st Cir. 1992), he lacked standing
    to appeal the bankruptcy court’s order approving the settlement, because he could not
    show he has a pecuniary interest in the order, see In re Marlar, 
    252 B.R. 743
    , 748
    (B.A.P. 8th Cir. 2000) (party ordinarily has no standing to appeal unless party can
    show basis for arguing that challenged action caused him cognizable injury, i.e.,
    party was aggrieved by order) aff’d, 
    267 F.3d 749
    (8th Cir. 2001); Spenlinhauer v.
    O’Donnell, 
    261 F.3d 113
    , 117-19 (1st Cir. 2001) (standing to appeal from bankruptcy
    court order requires showing that challenged order directly and adversely affects
    appellant’s pecuniary interests).
    Accordingly, we affirm.
    ______________________________
    1
    The Honorable Barry S. Schermer, United States Bankruptcy Judge for the
    Eastern District of Missouri.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 03-1779

Citation Numbers: 83 F. App'x 141, 83 Fed. Appx. 141, 83 F. App’x 141, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 25061

Judges: Riley, McMillian, Smith

Filed Date: 12/12/2003

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/6/2024