United States v. Patricia K. Langer , 158 F. App'x 759 ( 2005 )


Menu:
  •                       United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    ___________
    No. 05-1408
    ___________
    United States of America,              *
    *
    Appellee,                  *
    *
    v.                               *
    *
    Patricia K. Langer,                    *
    *
    Appellant.                  *
    ___________
    Appeals from the United States
    No. 05-1409                          District Court for the
    ___________                          District of Minnesota.
    United States of America,              *
    *   [UNPUBLISHED]
    Appellee,                  *
    *
    v.                               *
    *
    Henry J. Langer,                       *
    *
    Appellant.                 *
    ___________
    Submitted: December 7, 2005
    Filed: December 29, 2005
    ___________
    Before MURPHY, COLLOTON, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    In these consolidated appeals, Patricia K. Langer and Henry J. Langer appeal
    the district court’s1 orders enforcing Internal Revenue Service (IRS) summonses.
    Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude that the district court did not
    clearly err in enforcing the summonses. See United States v. Powell, 
    379 U.S. 48
    , 57-
    58 (1964) (enforcement of IRS summons is appropriate where record establishes that
    (1) there is legitimate purpose for investigation, (2) inquiry might be relevant to
    purpose, (3) IRS does not already have information sought, and (4) requisite
    administrative steps have been followed); United States v. Norwood, 
    420 F.3d 888
    ,
    892 (8th Cir. 2005) (prima facie case for enforcement of summons may be established
    by minimal showing of good faith compliance with requirements for summons and
    can be demonstrated by IRS agent’s affidavit); United States v. Kaiser, 
    397 F.3d 641
    ,
    643 (8th Cir. 2005) (reviewing for clear error enforcement of IRS summons). The
    various assertions the Langers raise on appeal provide no basis for reversal.
    Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. 47B. We also grant appellee’s motion to
    quash the new exhibits the Langers have submitted with their reply brief.
    ______________________________
    1
    The Honorable Donovan W. Frank, United States District Judge for the District
    of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Janie S.
    Mayeron, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota (No. 05-1408);
    and the Honorable David S. Doty, United States District Judge for the District of
    Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Susan Richard
    Nelson, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota (No. 05-1409).
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 05-1408, 05-1409

Citation Numbers: 158 F. App'x 759

Judges: Murphy, Colloton, Benton

Filed Date: 12/29/2005

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024