United States v. Bradford Lazarski ( 2006 )

United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 05-1081
___________
United States of America, *
*
Appellee, * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the Eastern
v. * District of Arkansas.
*
Bradford Lazarski, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellant. *
___________
Submitted: December 27, 2005
Filed: January 5, 2006
___________
Before ARNOLD, FAGG, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Bradford Lazarski appeals the sentence imposed after Lazarski pleaded guilty
to being a felon in possession of a firearm. Lazarski argues the district court*
erroneously sentenced him as an armed career criminal, because two of the earlier
felony convictions upon which his armed-career-criminal classification was based
were not violent felonies. Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude the
district court correctly determined the felony convictions in questions were violent
felonies within the meaning of the relevant statute. See 18 U.S.C. § 924(e); United
*
The Honorable James M. Moody, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Arkansas.
States v. Sprouse, 394 F.3d 578, 580-81 (8th Cir. 2005); United States v. Sun Bear,
307 F.3d 747, 752-53 (8th Cir. 2002), cert. denied, 539 U.S. 916 (2003). Accordingly,
we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-