Konstantinos Ritos v. John Ashcroft , 161 F. App'x 620 ( 2006 )


Menu:
  •                       United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    ___________
    No. 05-1183
    ___________
    Konstantinos Ritos,                   *
    *
    Petitioner,              *
    * Petition for Review of an Order of
    v.                             * the Board of Immigration Appeals.
    *
    1
    Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General    *        UNPUBLISHED
    of the United States of America,      *
    *
    Respondent.              *
    ___________
    Submitted: November 18, 2005
    Filed: January 9, 2006
    ___________
    Before WOLLMAN, LAY, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    Konstantinos Ritos, a citizen of Greece, petitions for review of an order of the
    Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”), which affirmed without opinion an
    1
    Alberto Gonzales has been appointed to serve as Attorney General of the
    United States and is substituted as the appellee pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate
    Procedure 43(c).
    Immigration Judge’s denial of Ritos’s requests for asylum, withholding of removal,
    and relief under Article 3 of the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”).2
    We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s determination that Ritos’s asylum
    application was not timely filed within one year of his arrival into the United States
    and that he did not show changed or extraordinary circumstances justifying his
    untimely application. See 
    8 U.S.C. § 1158
    (a)(3); Ngure v. Ashcroft, 
    367 F.3d 975
    ,
    988-89 (8th Cir. 2004).
    Ritos also claims he is entitled to withholding of removal under 
    8 U.S.C. § 1231
    (b)(3), which is not subject to a one-year filing deadline. After a careful review
    of the record, we conclude that Ritos is not entitled to withholding of removal because
    he failed to demonstrate a clear probability that he would be persecuted on one of the
    enumerated grounds if removed to Greece. See Tawm v. Ashcroft, 
    363 F.3d 740
    , 744
    (8th Cir. 2004). Ritos also failed to carry his burden for relief under the CAT because
    he has not shown that it is more likely than not that he will be tortured if he returns to
    Greece. 
    Id.
    Accordingly, we deny the petition.
    ______________________________
    2
    Ritos has not appealed the Immigration Judge’s denial of his request for
    voluntary departure.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 05-1183

Citation Numbers: 161 F. App'x 620

Judges: Wollman, Lay, Melloy

Filed Date: 1/9/2006

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024