United States v. Sharon Toman ( 2008 )


Menu:
  •                         United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    ___________
    Nos. 06-2313/2835
    ___________
    United States of America,                      *
    *
    Appellant,                      *
    * Appeals from the United States
    v.                                      * District Court for the Western
    * District of Missouri.
    Sharon Toman,                                  *
    * [UNPUBLISHED]
    Appellee.                       *
    *
    -------------------------------------          *
    *
    United States of America,                      *
    *
    Appellant,                      *
    *
    v.                                      *
    *
    Sharon Toman,                                  *
    *
    Appellee.                       *
    ___________
    Submitted: December 27, 2007
    Filed: January 11, 2008
    ___________
    Before WOLLMAN, COLLOTON, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    In these consolidated appeals, the government appeals the district court’s order
    granting Sharon Toman’s motion to expunge her convictions, one of which was
    previously set aside under the Federal Youth Corrections Act (FYCA), 
    18 U.S.C. § 5010
    (a) (repealed 1984), and the order denying the government’s motion to
    reconsider. We find that the district court did not have jurisdiction to expunge either
    of Toman’s convictions, see United States v. Meyer, 
    439 F.3d 855
    , 859-60 (8th Cir.
    2006) (district court does not have ancillary jurisdiction to expunge conviction based
    solely on equitable considerations); Bear Robe v. Parker, 
    270 F.3d 1192
    , 1195 (8th
    Cir. 2001) (set-aside provision of FYCA is not equivalent to expungement of record);
    United States v. McMains, 
    540 F.2d 387
    , 389 (8th Cir. 1976) (FYCA does not
    authorize expungement of record), and thus we reverse and remand to the district
    court with instructions to vacate the expungement order. We also deny Toman’s
    motion to dismiss the appeal.
    ______________________________
    -2-