Jerry Champion v. Wendy Kelley ( 2012 )


Menu:
  •                   United States Court of Appeals
    For the Eighth Circuit
    ___________________________
    No. 12-1419
    ___________________________
    Jerry Champion,
    lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    Wendy Kelley, Deputy Director of Health, Arkansas Department of Correction;
    Walter Holloway, Infirmary Manager, East Arkansas Regional Unit, ADC;
    Amanda Norman, Nurse, East Arkansas Regional Unit, ADC,
    lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees.
    ____________
    Appeal from United States District Court
    for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Helena
    ____________
    Submitted: December 4, 2012
    Filed: December 26, 2012
    [Unpublished]
    ____________
    Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.
    ____________
    PER CURIAM.
    After Arkansas Department of Correction (ADC) inmate Jerry Champion did
    not receive two of three daily doses of pain medication on January 26, 2010, he filed
    this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action asserting claims of deliberate indifference to his serious
    medical needs against the nurse who dispensed his medication, the infirmary director,
    and ADC’s Deputy Director of Health. The district court1 granted defendants’
    motions for summary judgment, and Champion appeals.
    Following de novo review, see Beaulieu v. Ludeman, 
    690 F.3d 1017
    , 1024 (8th
    Cir. 2012), we agree with the district court that Champion’s deliberate-indifference
    claims fail, because the record established there was no indifference to a serious
    medical need, much less deliberate indifference. See Estelle v. Gamble, 
    429 U.S. 97
    ,
    104-05 (1976) (deliberate indifference includes intentional interference with
    prescribed treatment; inadvertent or negligent failure to provide adequate medical
    care cannot be said to constitute “unnecessary and wanton infliction of pain”); Luckert
    v. Dodge Cnty., 
    684 F.3d 808
    , 817 (8th Cir. 2012) (prison supervisors are not liable
    under § 1983 on respondeat superior theory), petition for cert. filed, (Oct 24, 2012)
    (No. 12-523); Gardner v. Howard, 
    109 F.3d 427
    , 430 (8th Cir. 1997) (no § 1983
    liability for violation of prison policy).
    Accordingly, we affirm, see 8th Cir. R. 47B, and we deny all of the pending
    motions.
    ______________________________
    1
    The Honorable Jerome T. Kearney, United States Magistrate Judge for the
    Eastern District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by
    consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 12-1419

Judges: Loken, Bowman, Colloton

Filed Date: 12/26/2012

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/6/2024