United States v. Jason Eisenach ( 2018 )

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 17-3781
___________________________
United States of America,
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee,
v.
Jason August Eisenach,
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant.
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of Minnesota - St. Paul
____________
Submitted: October 5, 2018
Filed: October 16, 2018
[Unpublished]
____________
Before LOKEN, COLLOTON, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Jason Eisenach appeals the sentence imposed by the district court1 after he
pleaded guilty to child-pornography offenses. Eisenach’s counsel moved to withdraw
1
The Honorable David S. Doty, United States District Judge for the District of
Minnesota.
and filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), challenging the
sentence as substantively unreasonable.
We conclude that the district court did not impose an unreasonable sentence.
The sentence was below the advisory guideline range. The court properly considered
the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), and there is no indication that the court
committed a clear error of judgment in weighing relevant factors. See United States
v. Salazar-Aleman, 741 F.3d 878, 881 (8th Cir. 2013) (standard of review); see also
United States v. Torres-Ojeda, 829 F.3d 1027, 1030 (8th Cir. 2016).
Having independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75
(1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we grant counsel’s
motion and affirm.
______________________________
-2-