United States v. Pete C. Brown , 33 F. App'x 241 ( 2002 )


Menu:
  •                      United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    ___________
    No. 02-1015
    ___________
    United States of America,                *
    *
    Appellee,                   *
    * Appeal from the United States
    v.                                 * District Court for the
    * Eastern District of Arkansas.
    Pete Christopher Brown,                  *    [UNPUBLISHED]
    *
    Appellant.                  *
    ___________
    Submitted: April 24, 2002
    Filed: April 29, 2002
    ___________
    Before WOLLMAN, FAGG, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    Pete Christopher Brown pleaded guilty to willfully and knowingly stealing in
    excess of $1,000 belonging to the United States, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 641. The
    district court1 sentenced him to 18 months in prison and 3 years of supervised release,
    and imposed mandatory restitution of $3,000. On appeal, Brown argues the court
    should have granted an acceptance-of-responsibility reduction.
    1
    The Honorable Susan Webber Wright, Chief Judge, United States District
    Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas.
    We conclude that the court did not clearly err in denying the reduction,
    because--even though Brown came forward and admitted his crime--he had
    subsequently tested positive for drugs, failed to complete a drug treatment program
    as ordered, and failed to report to his pretrial services officer. See U.S.S.G.
    § 3E1.1(a) (defendant may receive reduction if he “clearly demonstrates acceptance
    of responsibility for his offense”); United States v. Ervasti, 
    201 F.3d 1029
    , 1043 (8th
    Cir. 2000) (standard of review); United States v. Byrd, 
    76 F.3d 194
    , 196-97 (8th Cir.
    1996) (sentencing judge may consider conduct unrelated to offense in determining
    whether defendant qualifies for acceptance-of-responsibility adjustment).
    Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.
    A true copy.
    Attest:
    CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 02-1015

Citation Numbers: 33 F. App'x 241

Judges: Wollman, Fagg, Arnold

Filed Date: 4/29/2002

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024