Snipes v. Oakdale Classification & Medical Center ( 2002 )


Menu:
  •                     United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    ___________
    No. 02-1160
    ___________
    Ronald L. Snipes,                        *
    *
    Appellant,                   *
    * Appeal from the United States
    v.                                 * District Court for the
    * Southern District of Iowa.
    Oakdale Classification and Medical       *
    Center; Health Services; David J. Scurr; *    [UNPUBLISHED]
    Dr. Ann Mueller; D. Murray, R.N.,        *
    *
    Appellees.                   *
    ___________
    Submitted: June 4, 2002
    Filed: June 6, 2002
    ___________
    Before McMILLIAN, BOWMAN, and BYE, Circuit Judges.
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    Iowa inmate Ronald L. Snipes appeals the District Court’s1 adverse grant of
    summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Having carefully reviewed the
    record, see Jolly v. Knudsen, 
    205 F.3d 1094
    , 1096 (8th Cir. 2000) (standard of
    review), we affirm.
    1
    The Honorable Ronald H. Longstaff, Chief Judge, United States District Court
    for the Southern District of Iowa.
    Snipes claimed that Clarinda Correctional Facility Dr. Ann Mueller and Nurse
    D. Murray were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical need: rectal bleeding
    from internal hemorrhoids. He alleged that Dr. Mueller had failed to recommend
    surgery, and that Dr. Mueller and Nurse Murray had denied him feminine maxi-pads
    to control his bleeding.
    Assuming that Snipes’s hemorrhoid condition constituted a serious medical
    need, the medical records and expert opinion he submitted fell far short of creating
    a triable issue on whether Dr. Mueller and Nurse Murray ignored an acute or
    escalating condition. See 
    Jolly, 205 F.3d at 1096
    (holding that an inmate must show
    that he suffered from serious medical need, which prison officials knew of and
    deliberately ignored; mere disagreement with treatment decisions does not rise to
    level of constitutional violation); Dulany v. Carnahan, 
    132 F.3d 1234
    , 1243 (8th Cir.
    1997).
    Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
    A true copy.
    Attest:
    CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 02-1160

Judges: McMillian, Bowman, Bye

Filed Date: 6/6/2002

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024