Weaver v. United States Postal Service ( 2002 )


Menu:
  •                     United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    ___________
    No. 02-2618
    ___________
    Louise Weaver,                         *
    *
    Appellant,                 *
    * Appeal from the United States
    v.                              * District Court for the
    * Eastern District of Missouri.
    United States Postal Service; John E.  *
    1
    Potter, CEO, Postmaster General,       *      [UNPUBLISHED]
    *
    Appellees.                 *
    ___________
    Submitted: November 15, 2002
    Filed: November 18, 2002
    ___________
    Before McMILLIAN, FAGG, and BOWMAN, Circuit Judges.
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    Louise Weaver appeals the District Court’s2 adverse grant of summary
    judgment in her employment-discrimination action. Having carefully reviewed the
    record, see Jacob-Mua v. Veneman, 
    289 F.3d 517
    , 520 (8th Cir. 2002) (standard of
    review), we affirm.
    1
    John E. Potter has been appointed to serve as Postmaster General, and is
    substituted as appellee pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 43(c).
    2
    The Honorable Jean C. Hamilton, United States District Judge for the Eastern
    District of Missouri.
    Weaver, who is African American, filed suit against the Postmaster General,
    claiming race and sex discrimination, disparate treatment, and a hostile work
    environment based on allegedly unwarranted disciplinary actions taken against her.
    We agree with the District Court that Weaver failed to establish the existence
    of a genuine issue for trial as to any of her claims. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(e) (adverse
    party’s response must show existence of triable issue); Habib v. NationsBank, 
    279 F.3d 563
    , 566 (8th Cir. 2001) (holding plaintiff failed to make out prima facie case
    of discrimination based on circumstantial evidence); Palesch v. Missouri Comm’n on
    Human Rights, 
    233 F.3d 560
    , 566-68 (8th Cir. 2000) (affirming summary judgment
    against plaintiff's hostile work environment and disparate treatment claims).
    Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
    A true copy.
    Attest:
    CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 02-2618

Judges: McMillian, Fagg, Bowman

Filed Date: 11/18/2002

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/6/2024