Sharen A. Postels v. JoAnne B. Barnhart , 55 F. App'x 392 ( 2003 )


Menu:
  •                      United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    ___________
    No. 02-2888
    ___________
    Sharen A. Postels,                      *
    *
    Appellant,           *
    * Appeal from the United States
    v.                               * District Court for the Southern
    * District of Iowa.
    Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner       *
    of the Social Security Administration, *      [UNPUBLISHED]
    *
    Appellee.            *
    ___________
    Submitted: January 13, 2003
    Filed: January 22, 2003
    ___________
    Before LOKEN, FAGG, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    In 1999, Sharon A. Postels sought disability insurance benefits asserting mental
    disorders disabled her beginning on June 15, 1981. An ALJ found Postels did not
    show she had any impairment that significantly limited her ability to perform basic
    work activities before March 31, 1987, her last date insured. The ALJ thus concluded
    Postels was not entitled to benefits. See Basinger v. Heckler, 
    725 F.2d 1166
    , 1168
    (8th Cir. 1984). The Appeals Council denied further review. Postels sought judicial
    review, and the district court* held substantial evidence supported the decision to
    deny benefits.
    On appeal, Postels contends the ALJ committed error in rejecting the opinions
    of her treating physicians and in terminating the analysis before considering
    vocational factors. Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude the ALJ
    properly determined that Postels did not show she suffered from a severe mental
    impairment before her insured status expired on March 31, 1987. The ALJ properly
    rejected the retrospective testimony of Postels’s treating physicians because they had
    limited contact with Postels during the relevant time period. Because Postels’s
    impairment would have had no more than a minimal effect on her ability to work, the
    ALJ properly terminated the analysis after determining she had no severe impairment.
    Nguyen v. Chater, 
    75 F.3d 429
    , 431 (8th Cir. 1996).
    Substantial evidence on the record as a whole supports the denial of benefits,
    thus we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
    A true copy.
    Attest:
    CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
    *
    The Honorable Charles R. Wolle, United States District Judge for the Southern
    District of Iowa.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 02-2888

Citation Numbers: 55 F. App'x 392

Judges: Loken, Fagg, Arnold

Filed Date: 1/22/2003

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/6/2024