Mohammed H. Marah v. John Ashcroft , 63 F. App'x 278 ( 2003 )


Menu:
  •                     United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    ___________
    No. 02-3403
    ___________
    Mohammed H. Marah,                      *
    *
    Petitioner,                *
    * Petition for Review of an
    v.                                * Order of the Immigration and
    * Naturalization Service.
    John Ashcroft,                          *
    * [UNPUBLISHED]
    Respondent.                *
    ___________
    Submitted: April 11, 2003
    Filed: April 17, 2003
    ___________
    Before BOWMAN, WOLLMAN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    Yemen citizen Mohammed H. Marah petitions for review of an order of the
    Board of Immigration Appeals, which affirmed an Immigration Judge’s (IJ’s) denial
    of Marah’s application for asylum and withholding of removal. For reversal, Marah
    argues that the IJ erred in making an adverse credibility determination, and in
    concluding that Marah’s fear of persecution was not reasonable. After careful review,
    we deny the petition.
    Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s credibility determination, as Marah’s
    testimony was not only internally inconsistent but differed from his asylum
    application on several points. See Navarijo-Barrios v. INS, 
    322 F.3d 561
     (8th Cir.
    2003); Perinpanathan v. INS, 
    310 F.3d 594
    , 598 (8th Cir. 2002). Even without regard
    to the credibility determination, the IJ’s denial of asylum is supported by substantial
    evidence. Among other things, Marah’s fear of persecution is based upon an isolated
    incident that occurred six or seven years before the asylum hearing. Further, he
    acknowledged that he had not belonged to political organizations in Yemen, and that
    he had not been mistreated or threatened based upon his political opinion. Cf.
    Regalado-Garcia v. INS, 
    305 F.3d 784
    , 788 (8th Cir. 2002) (fear of future persecution
    was not well founded or reasonable where more than decade had passed since
    applicant’s political activities and he did not maintain connection with political
    organizations after leaving Mexico). Finally, his testimony about Saudi Arabia was
    not relevant because the government sought to deport him only to Yemen.
    Accordingly, we deny the petition.
    A true copy.
    Attest:
    CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 02-3403

Citation Numbers: 63 F. App'x 278

Judges: Bowman, Wollman, Hansen

Filed Date: 4/17/2003

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/6/2024