Mays v. Internal Revenue Service , 81 F. App'x 900 ( 2003 )


Menu:
  •                     United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    ___________
    No. 03-1989
    ___________
    Dale G. Mays; Sylvia M. Wilhemi,        *
    *
    Appellants,                * Appeal from the United States
    * District Court for the
    v.                                * District of Minnesota.
    *
    Internal Revenue Service,               *      [UNPUBLISHED]
    *
    Appellee.                  *
    ___________
    Submitted: November 25, 2003
    Filed: December 4, 2003
    ___________
    Before BYE, BOWMAN, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    Dale G. Mays and Sylvia M. Wilhelmi, husband and wife, filed the instant
    action, alleging the Internal Revenue Service unjustly withheld their tax refund for
    the 1994 tax year. The District Court1 dismissed the action with prejudice under
    Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). We conclude that the District Court did not
    abuse its discretion: appellants produced requested discovery only after the District
    Court’s repeated interventions, they failed to comply with court orders or to appear
    1
    The Honorable Michael J. Davis, United States District Judge for the District
    of Minnesota.
    at scheduled conferences and hearings, and they were specifically warned that failure
    to comply with a particular court order would result in dismissal of their action with
    prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Good Stewardship Christian Center v. Empire
    Bank, 
    341 F.3d 794
    , 797 (8th Cir. 2003) (standard of review); Rodgers v. Curators
    of Univ. of Mo., 
    135 F.3d 1216
    , 1219 (8th Cir. 1998); Aziz v. Wright, 
    34 F.3d 587
    ,
    589 (8th Cir. 1994), cert. denied, 
    513 U.S. 1090
    (1995).
    Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
    ______________________________
    -2-