AgriProcessors, Inc. v. Iowa Quality Beef Supply Network, LLC (In Re Tama Beef Packing, Inc.) ( 2004 )


Menu:
  •                     United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    ___________
    No. 03-2057
    ___________
    In re: Tama Beef Packing, Inc.,              *
    *
    Debtor,                       *
    ---------------------------------------      *
    *
    AgriProcessors, Inc.,                        *
    *
    Appellee,                     *
    * Appeal from the United States
    v.                                   * Bankruptcy Appellate Panel
    * for the Eighth Circuit.
    Iowa Quality Beef Supply                     *
    Network, LLC,                                *    [UNPUBLISHED]
    *
    Appellant.                    *
    ___________
    Submitted: December 24, 2003
    Filed: February 6, 2004
    ___________
    Before BYE, BOWMAN, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    Iowa Quality Beef Supply Network, LLC (IQBSN) appeals the bankruptcy
    appellate panel’s (BAP’s) order reversing the bankruptcy court’s order denying
    AgriProcessors, Inc. (AgriProcessors) payment of administrative expenses. We
    conclude that we lack jurisdiction.
    IQBSN was the successful bidder in negotiations to purchase the right to
    assume an unexpired lease belonging to bankrupt Tama Beef Packing, Inc.
    AgriProcessors, an unsuccessful bidder, applied for payment of administrative
    expenses for the costs it incurred in negotiating with the trustee. While the trustee
    agreed that AgriProcessors should be paid, IQBSN objected to AgriProcessors’
    application, assertedly “on behalf of” priority and nonpriority creditors with whom
    it wished to do business. The bankruptcy court denied AgriProcessors’ application,
    but the BAP reversed, and remanded for a determination of the reasonableness of the
    fees. IQBSN appeals.
    We have an independent obligation to examine our jurisdiction. See Int’l Ass’n
    of Fire Fighters v. City of Clayton, 
    320 F.3d 849
    , 850 (8th Cir. 2003). To have
    standing to appeal, IQBSN must show it had a pecuniary interest in how the trustee
    allocated the funds IQBSN paid for the lease. See In re Marlar, 
    252 B.R. 743
    , 748
    (B.A.P. 8th Cir. 2000) (party ordinarily must show basis for arguing that challenged
    action caused cognizable injury, i.e., that party was aggrieved by order), aff’d, 
    267 F.3d 749
    (8th Cir. 2001); cf. Spenlinhauer v. O’Donnell, 
    261 F.3d 113
    , 117-19 (1st
    Cir. 2001) (standing to appeal from final bankruptcy court order requires showing
    that challenged order directly and adversely affects appellant’s pecuniary interests).
    IQBSN is not a debtor, trustee, or creditor, and has not alleged that it would be
    directly financially affected by the allowance of AgriProcessors’ claim. Rather,
    IQBSN hopes the creditors will be paid as much as possible so that it can do business
    with them on good terms. Although IQBSN purported to be objecting “on behalf of”
    these creditors, there is no indication that IQBSN is legally representing them. Thus,
    we can discern no basis for appellate standing.
    Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
    ______________________________
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 03-2057

Judges: Bye, Bowman, Melloy

Filed Date: 2/6/2004

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024