United States v. Kenneth Epps ( 2004 )


Menu:
  •                     United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    ___________
    No. 03-3048
    ___________
    United States of America,              *
    *
    Appellee,                  *
    * Appeal from the United States
    v.                               * District Court for the
    * District of Minnesota
    Kenneth Epps,                          *
    *    [UNPUBLISHED]
    Appellant.                 *
    ___________
    Submitted: April 15, 2004
    Filed: April 26, 2004
    ___________
    Before BYE, McMILLIAN, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    Federal inmate Kenneth Epps appeals from the final judgment entered in the
    United States District Court1 for the District of Minnesota committing him to the
    custody of the Attorney General under 18 U.S.C. § 4245, which provides for the
    involuntary hospitalization of an imprisoned person suffering from a mental disease
    ¹The Honorable David S. Doty, United States District Judge for the District of
    Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Susan Richard
    Nelson, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.
    or defect, until treatment is no longer needed or the expiration of the inmate’s
    sentence, whichever occurs first. After a hearing, the district court found the
    government had met its burden of establishing by a preponderance of evidence that
    Epps suffers from a mental illness requiring treatment in a suitable facility, such as
    the Federal Medical Center (FMC) in Rochester, Minnesota. See 18 U.S.C. § 4245(d)
    (burden of proof). Contrary to Epps’s argument on appeal, we conclude the district
    court’s finding was not clearly erroneous. See United States v. Eckerson, 
    299 F.3d 913
    , 914-15 (8th Cir. 2002) (per curiam) (standard of review). Specifically, the
    government offered testimony of FMC staff psychiatrist Dr. Daniel Shine, who saw
    Epps regularly over a considerable period of time. Dr. Shine’s opinion concerning
    Epps’s diagnosis and need for treatment, expressed at the hearing and in a written
    psychological evaluation, supported the district court’s order.
    Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. Counsel’s motion
    to withdraw is granted.
    ______________________________
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 03-3048

Judges: Bye, McMILLIAN, Per Curiam, Riley

Filed Date: 4/26/2004

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 9/1/2023