United States v. Angelia M. Orth ( 2004 )


Menu:
  •                    United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    ___________
    No. 04-1045
    ___________
    United States of America,               *
    *
    Plaintiff-Appellee,         *
    v.                                *   Appeal from the United States
    *   District Court for the
    Angelia M. Orth,                        *   District of Nebraska.
    *
    Defendant-Appellant.        *    [UNPUBLISHED]
    ___________
    Submitted: July 22, 2004
    Filed: August 12, 2004
    ___________
    Before MELLOY, LAY, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    The Defendant challenges the district court’s denial of her motion for a
    downward departure. See United States Sentencing Commission, Guidelines Manual,
    § 5K2.0 (Nov. 2002). The Defendant, by and through her counsel, raised several
    mitigating circumstances to her sentence, but the trial judge found that these
    circumstances did not warrant a downward departure. On appeal, her counsel has
    moved to withdraw and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 
    386 U.S. 738
    (1967).
    This court has reviewed the record of the district court in accordance with
    Penson v. Ohio, 
    488 U.S. 75
     (1988), and finds no nonfrivolous issues. The district
    court’s informed decision not to depart is not reviewable. See e.g., United States v.
    Turechek, 
    138 F.3d 1226
    , 1228 (8th Cir. 1998). The district court’s decision is
    affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
    We also grant defense counsel’s motion to withdraw. Counsel is reminded of
    the obligations under Part V of this Court’s Amended Criminal Justice Act Plan.
    Specifically, counsel is to advise the defendant of the right to file a petition for writ
    of certiorari in the Supreme Court of the United States, and to inform the defendant
    as to the merits and likelihood of success in the filing of such a petition. If counsel
    determines there are meritorious issues, defense counsel shall assist the defendant in
    filing a petition for writ of certiorari. If counsel determines there are no meritorious
    issues warranting the filing of a petition for writ of certiorari, counsel shall advise the
    defendant of the procedures for filing a petition pro se, and the time limits for the
    filing of such a petition. Counsel shall file a certification with the clerk within 30
    days certifying that he has complied with his obligations under Part V.
    ______________________________
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 04-1045

Judges: Melloy, Lay, Colloton

Filed Date: 8/12/2004

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024