-
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 04-2562 ___________ Timothy Lee Newton, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Western v. * District of Missouri. * Jeremiah Nixon, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee, * ___________ Submitted: September 30, 2004 Filed: October 12, 2004 ___________ Before MURPHY, FAGG, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM. Timothy Lee Newton brought an action for damages, claiming the Missouri Attorney General had engaged in fraud when he opposed Newton’s earlier federal habeas corpus petition. The district court* viewed this action as an attempt to revive the habeas case, and dismissed the complaint. After careful review, we conclude dismissal was proper under
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(I). Newton’s action was legally frivolous because it depended on the habeas court’s having wrongly determined his petition was time-barred. See Kelly v. Armstrong,
141 F.3d 799, 801 * The Honorable Ortrie D. Smith, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. (8th Cir. 1998) (issue preclusion). Accordingly, we affirm. We deny Newton’s pending motions. ______________________________ -2-
Document Info
Docket Number: 04-2562
Citation Numbers: 110 F. App'x 734
Judges: Murphy, Fagg, Smith
Filed Date: 10/12/2004
Precedential Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024