John McManus v. Essex Insurance Co. , 110 F. App'x 741 ( 2004 )


Menu:
  •                    United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    ___________
    No. 03-3398
    ___________
    Essex Insurance Company,                *
    *
    Appellee,                  *
    * Appeal from the United States
    v.                                * District Court for the Eastern
    * District of Missouri.
    John McManus, doing business as         *
    Jay Hydraulics & Electric Co.,          *       [UNPUBLISHED]
    *
    Appellant,                 *
    *
    Internal Revenue Service,               *
    *
    Appellee,                  *
    *
    City of St. Louis,                      *
    *
    Defendant,                 *
    *
    Adjusters Incorporated for the People, *
    doing business as Adjusters, Inc.,      *
    *
    Appellee.                  *
    ___________
    Submitted: October 7, 2004
    Filed: October 15, 2004
    ___________
    Before WOLLMAN, McMILLIAN, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    John McManus (McManus) appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of
    summary judgment to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) on its claim filed in an
    interpleader action brought by Essex Insurance Company. He also has filed motions
    requesting to continue his cross-claims against Adjusters Incorporated for the People
    (Adjusters) and the IRS, and to supplement the record on appeal.
    We dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction, because at the time the district
    court granted summary judgment, the cross-claims were pending and the district court
    did not rule on them. Thus there was no final judgment from which to take an appeal.
    See 
    28 U.S.C. § 1291
     (appellate jurisdiction over final orders); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b)
    (“order or other form of decision, however designated, which adjudicates fewer than
    all the claims or the rights and liabilities of fewer than all the parties shall not
    terminate the action as to any of the claims or parties”); Miller v. Special Weapons,
    L.L.C., 
    369 F.3d 1033
    , 1034-35 (8th Cir. 2004); Thomas v. Basham, 
    931 F.2d 521
    ,
    522-24 (8th Cir. 1991) (appellate courts have obligation to raise jurisdictional issues
    sua sponte “when there is an indication that jurisdiction is lacking”). Given this
    disposition, we need not rule on McManus’s pending motions.
    Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal.
    ______________________________
    1
    The Honorable Charles A. Shaw, United States District Judge for the Eastern
    District of Missouri.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 03-3398

Citation Numbers: 110 F. App'x 741

Judges: Wollman, McMillian, Riley

Filed Date: 10/15/2004

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024