Trustees of the Trism Liquidating Trust v. Internal Revenue Service (In Re Trism, Inc.) , 126 F. App'x 339 ( 2005 )


Menu:
  •                       United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    ___________
    No. 04-2952
    ___________
    In re: Trism, Inc.,                    *
    *
    Debtor             *
    ___________________                    *
    *
    Trustees of the Trism Liquidating      *
    Trust,                                 * Appeal from the United States
    * Bankruptcy Appellate Panel.
    Appellant,         *
    *      [UNPUBLISHED]
    v.                              *
    *
    Internal Revenue Service,              *
    *
    Appellee.          *
    ___________
    Submitted: April 13, 2005
    Filed: April 21, 2005
    ___________
    Before LOKEN, Chief Judge, FAGG and BYE, Circuit Judges.
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    Trism, Inc., an interstate trucking company, filed for bankruptcy under Chapter
    11. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) filed a claim for unpaid assessments on
    Trism’s operation of heavy motor vehicles on the highways. See 
    26 U.S.C. § 4481
    .
    Trism objected to the claim’s priority classification, then confirmed a liquidating plan
    assigning authority to liquidate claim objections to the Trustees. After a hearing, the
    bankruptcy court decided the monetary obligation imposed by § 4481 was an excise
    tax on a transaction entitled to priority under 
    11 U.S.C. § 507
    (a)(8)(E) (granting
    priority to unsecured governmental claims for an “excise tax” on a “transaction”).
    The Bankruptcy Appellate Panel affirmed. In re Trism, 
    311 B.R. 509
     (B.A.P. 8th Cir.
    2004). The Trustees appeal arguing the bankruptcy court and BAP erroneously
    concluded the charges were a tax, rather than a user fee, and erroneously found a
    transaction had occurred. Having carefully reviewed the record, the briefs, and the
    applicable law, we conclude the bankruptcy court and BAP correctly decided the
    case. The obligation imposed by § 4481 is a tax, not a fee. Id. at 513-16. Further,
    the obligation is an excise tax on a transaction. Id. at 516-17. Because we have
    nothing to add to the BAP’s explanation, we summarily affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
    ______________________________
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 04-2952

Citation Numbers: 126 F. App'x 339

Judges: Loken, Fagg, Bye

Filed Date: 4/21/2005

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024