United States v. Randall Haggart ( 2022 )

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 22-1479
___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
v.
Randall Joe Haggart, also known as Randall Jo Haggart
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Southern District of Iowa - Western
____________
Submitted: July 1, 2022
Filed: July 12, 2022
[Unpublished]
____________
Before ERICKSON, GRASZ, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Randall Haggart appeals after the district court1 revoked his supervised release
and sentenced him to 22 months in prison and 2 years of supervised release. His
1
The Honorable Stephanie M. Rose, Chief Judge, United States District Court
for the Southern District of Iowa.
counsel has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967), challenging the revocation sentence.
After careful review of the record, we conclude the district court did not abuse
its discretion in sentencing Haggart, as there is no indication the district court
overlooked a relevant factor, gave significant weight to an improper or irrelevant
factor, or committed a clear error of judgment in weighing the relevant factors. See
United States v. Miller, 557 F.3d 910, 914 (8th Cir. 2009) (reviewing district court’s
decision to revoke supervised release for abuse of discretion); United States v.
Larison, 432 F.3d 921, 922-23 (8th Cir. 2006) (determining revocation sentence
unreasonable when district court fails to consider relevant 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factor,
gives significant weight to improper or irrelevant factor, or commits clear error of
judgment); see also United States v. Callaway, 762 F.3d 754, 760 (8th Cir. 2014)
(presuming within-Guidelines sentence reasonable).
Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw and affirm.
______________________________
-2-